Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:44:30 +0900] rev 40633
blackbox: inline temporary variables which are referenced only once
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:43:29 +0900] rev 40632
blackbox: simply update global lastui variable at once
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:38:43 +0900] rev 40631
blackbox: consolidate conditions for early return
Just pick the lastui only if it is usable.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 11 Nov 2018 16:34:49 +0900] rev 40630
blackbox: remove redundant check for unassigned repo
Since ui._bbvfs is looked through ui._bbrepo, the repo instance should
exist if ui._bbvfs isn't None.
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:15:28 -0500] rev 40629
tests: fix bytes/str issue I introduced when adding this test
# skip-blame just b prefixes for py3
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5271
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:14:47 -0800] rev 40628
shelve: use matcher to restrict prefetch to just the modified files
Shelve currently operates by:
- make a temp commit
- identify all the bases necessary to shelve, put them in the bundle
- use exportfile to export the temp commit to the bundle ('file' here means
"export to this fd", not "export this file")
- remove the temp commit
exportfile calls prefetchfiles, and prefetchfiles uses a matcher to restrict
what files it's going to prefetch; if it's not provided, it's alwaysmatcher.
This means that `hg shelve` in a remotefilelog repo can possibly download the
file contents of everything in the repository, even when it doesn't need to. It
luckily is restricted to the narrowspec (if there is one), but this is still a
lot of downloading that's just unnecessary, especially if there's a "smart"
VCS-aware filesystem involved.
exportfile is called with exactly one revision to emit, so we're just
restricting it to prefetching the files from that revision. The base revisions
having separate files should not be a concern since they're handled already;
example:
commit 10 is draft and modifies foo/a.txt and foo/b.txt
commit 11 is draft and modifies foo/a.txt
my working directory that I'm shelving modifies foo/b.txt
By the time we get to exportfile, commit 10 and 11 are already handled, so the
matcher only specifying foo/b.txt does not cause any problems. I verified this
by doing an `hg unbundle` on the bundle that shelve produces, and getting the
full contents of those commits back out, instead of just the files that were
modified in the shelve.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5268
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:32:05 -0800] rev 40627
revlog: automatically read from opened file handles
The revlog reading code commonly opens a new file handle for
reading on demand. There is support for passing a file handle
to revlog.revision(). But it is marked as an internal argument.
When revlogs are written, we write() data as it is available. But
we don't flush() data until all revisions are written.
Putting these two traits together, it is possible for an in-process
revlog reader during active writes to trigger the opening of a new
file handle on a file with unflushed writes. The reader won't have
access to all "available" revlog data (as it hasn't been flushed).
And with the introduction of the previous patch, this can lead to
the revlog raising an error due to a partial read.
I witnessed this behavior when applying changegroup data (via
`hg pull`) before
issue6006 was fixed via different means. Having
this and the previous patch in play would have helped cause errors
earlier rather than manifesting as hash verification failures.
While this has been a long-standing issue, I believe the relatively
new delta computation code has tickled it into being more common.
This is because the new delta computation code will compute deltas
in more scenarios. This can lead to revlog reading. While the delta
computation code is probably supposed to reuse file handles, it
appears it isn't doing so in all circumstances.
But the issue runs deeper than that. Theoretically, any code can
access revision data during revlog writes. It appears we were just
getting lucky that it wasn't. (The "add revision callback" passed to
addgroup() provides an avenue to do this.)
If I changed the revlog's behavior to not cache the full revision
text or to clear caches after revision insertion during addgroup(),
I was able to produce crashes 100% of the time when writing changelog
revisions. This is because changelog's add revision callback attempts
to resolve the revision data to access the changed files list. And
without the revision's fulltext being cached, we performed a revlog
read, which required opening a new file handle. This attempted to read
unflushed data, leading to a partial read and a crash.
This commit teaches the revlog to store the file handles used for
writing multiple revisions during addgroup(). It also teaches the
code for resolving a file handle when reading to use these handles,
if available. This ensures that *any* reads (regardless of their
source) use the active writing file handles, if available. These
file handles have access to the unflushed data because they wrote it.
This allows reads to complete without issue.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5267
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:30:59 -0800] rev 40626
revlog: detect incomplete revlog reads
_readsegment() is supposed to return N bytes of revlog revision
data starting at a file offset. Surprisingly, its behavior before
this patch never verified that it actually read and returned N
bytes! Instead, it would perform the read(), then return whatever
data was available. And even more surprisingly, nothing in the
call chain appears to have been validating that it received all
the data it was expecting.
This behavior could lead to partial or incomplete revision chunks
being operated on. This could result in e.g. cached deltas being
applied against incomplete base revisions. The delta application
process would happily perform this operation. Only hash
verification would detect the corruption and save us.
This commit changes the behavior of raw revlog reading to validate
that we actually read() the number of bytes that were requested.
We will raise a more specific error faster, rather than possibly
have it go undetected or manifest later in the call stack, at
delta application or hash verification.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5266
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:50:05 -0700] rev 40625
revlog: use single file handle when de-inlining revlog
_getsegmentforrevs() will eventually call into _datareadfp() to
resolve a file handle to read revision data. If no file handle
is passed into _getsegmentforrevs(), it opens a new one.
Explicit is better than implicit.
This commit changes _enforceinlinesize() to open a file handle
explicitly when converting inline revlogs to split revlogs and
to pass this file handle into _getsegmentforrevs().
I haven't measured, but this change should improve performance,
as we no longer reopen the revlog for reading for every revision
in the revlog when it is converted from inline to split. Instead,
we open it at most once and use it for the duration of the
operation. That being said, I /think/ the chunk cache may mitigate
the number of file opens required.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5265
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:44:09 +0300] rev 40624
store: raise ProgrammingError if unable to decode a storage path
Right now, the function magically return False which is dangerous, so let's
raise ProgrammingError.
Suggested by Augie in D5139.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5264