Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:22:50 +0530 run-tests: '--time' option provide more details to Linux users
anuraggoel <anurag.dsps@gmail.com> [Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:22:50 +0530] rev 21977
run-tests: '--time' option provide more details to Linux users As our tests execute in child processes, this patch uses os.times() module in replace of time.time() module to provide additional info like user time and system time spent by child's processes along with real elapsed time taken by a process. There is one limitation of this patch. It can work only for Linux users and not for Windows. "os.times" module returns a 5-tuple of a floaing point numbers. 1) User time 2) System time 3) Child's user time 4) Child's system time 5) Ellapsed real time On Windows, only the first two items are filled, the others are zero. Therefore, below test cases does not break on Windows but instead gives the zero value.
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:32:52 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:32:52 -0500] rev 21976
merge with stable
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:23:18 -0500 Added signature for changeset 3178e4989202 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:23:18 -0500] rev 21975
Added signature for changeset 3178e4989202
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:22:56 -0500 Added tag 3.1 for changeset 3178e4989202 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:22:56 -0500] rev 21974
Added tag 3.1 for changeset 3178e4989202
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:01:35 -0700 status: do not reverse deleted and unknown stable 3.1
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:01:35 -0700] rev 21973
status: do not reverse deleted and unknown When reversing a status, trading "added" and "removed" make sense. Reversing "deleted" and "unknown" does not. We stop doing it. The reversing is documented in place for the poor soul not even able to remember the index of all status elements by heart.
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:49:00 -0700 status: don't drop unknown and ignored information (issue4321) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:49:00 -0700] rev 21972
status: don't drop unknown and ignored information (issue4321) By the magic of code movement, we ended up dropping unknown and ignored information when comparing the working directory with a non-parent revision. Let's stop doing it and add a test.
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:13:24 -0700 status: explicitly exclude removed file from unknown and ignored stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:13:24 -0700] rev 21971
status: explicitly exclude removed file from unknown and ignored Changeset 64fe488b5179 introduced a test to validate that file were not reported twice when both unknown and removed. This behavior change was introduced by 65cdc6bab91e alongside a bug that dropped ignored and unknown completely (issue4321). As we are going to fix the bug, we need a proper implementation of the behavior tested in 64fe488b5179.
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:45:26 -0500 merge with i18n some more stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:45:26 -0500] rev 21970
merge with i18n some more
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:44:50 -0500 merge with i18n stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:44:50 -0500] rev 21969
merge with i18n
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 17:29:02 +0900 i18n-ja: synchronized with f582fa1167f7 stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 01 Aug 2014 17:29:02 +0900] rev 21968
i18n-ja: synchronized with f582fa1167f7
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip