Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:34:12 +0900 shelve: keep old backups if timestamp can't decide exact order of them
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:34:12 +0900] rev 25774
shelve: keep old backups if timestamp can't decide exact order of them Before this patch, backups to be discarded are decided by steps below at 'hg unshelve' or so: 1. list '(st_mtime, filename)' tuples of each backups up 2. sort list of these tuples, and 3. discard backups other than 'maxbackups' ones at the end of list This doesn't work well in the case below: - "sort by name" order differs from actual backup-ing order, and - some of backups have same timestamp For example, 'test-shelve.t' satisfies the former condition: - 'default-01' < 'default-1' in "sort by name" order - 'default-1' < 'default-01' in actual backup-ing order Then, 'default-01' is discarded instead of 'default-1' unexpectedly, if they have same timestamp. This failure appears occasionally, because the most important condition "same timestamp" is timing critical. To avoid such unexpected discarding, this patch keeps old backups if timestamp can't decide exact order of them. Timestamp of the border backup (= the oldest one of recent 'maxbackups' ones) as 'bordermtime' is used to examine whether timestamp can decide exact order of backups.
Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:59:51 +0900 subrepo: use vfs.dirname instead of os.path.dirname
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:59:51 +0900] rev 25773
subrepo: use vfs.dirname instead of os.path.dirname This patch uses "wvfs of the parent repository" ('pwvfs') instead of 'wvfs' of own repository, because 'self._path' is the path to this subrepository as seen from the parent repository.
Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:59:51 +0900 vfs: add dirname
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:59:51 +0900] rev 25772
vfs: add dirname
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip