Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:55:39 +0200 tests: add missing accept of native pathname separator stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:55:39 +0200] rev 16540
tests: add missing accept of native pathname separator
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:22:56 +0200 tests: skip new tests with requirements not available on windows stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:22:56 +0200] rev 16539
tests: skip new tests with requirements not available on windows
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:22:47 +0200 tests: don't require 'hg' without extension on windows stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:22:47 +0200] rev 16538
tests: don't require 'hg' without extension on windows Hackable uses hg.exe instead.
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:22:35 +0200 update .hgignore for hackable with Python 2.7 stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 28 Apr 2012 01:22:35 +0200] rev 16537
update .hgignore for hackable with Python 2.7
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:01:57 +0200 commit: abort on merge with missing files stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:01:57 +0200] rev 16536
commit: abort on merge with missing files Here is a script illustrating the previous behaviour: The merge brings a new file 'b' from remote $ hg merge 1 --debug searching for copies back to rev 1 unmatched files in other: b resolving manifests overwrite: False, partial: False ancestor: 07f494440405, local: 540395c44225+, remote: 102a90ea7b4a b: remote created -> g updating: b 1/1 files (100.00%) getting b 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) Delete but do not remove b $ rm b $ hg st ! b The commit succeeds $ hg commit -m merge $ hg parents --template "{rev} {desc|firstline} files: {files}\n" 3 merge files: $ hg st ! b b changes were ignored, but even b existence was ignored $ hg manifest a This happens because localrepo.commitctx() checks the input ctx.files(), which is empty for workingctx.files() only returns added, modified or removed entries, and bypass files/manifest updates completely. So the committed revision manifest is the same as its first parent one, not containing the 'b' file. This patch forces the commit to abort in presence of a merge and missing files. test-merge4.t is modified accordingly as it was introduced to check hg was not just terminating with a traceback (5e9e8b8d2629).
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:32:44 +0200 branchmap: server should not advertise secret changeset in branchmap (Issue3303) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:32:44 +0200] rev 16535
branchmap: server should not advertise secret changeset in branchmap (Issue3303) Discovery now use an overlay above branchmap to prune invisible "secret" changeset from branchmap. To minimise impact on the code during the code freeze, this is achieve by recomputing non-secret heads on the fly when any secret changeset exists. This is a computation heavy approach similar to the one used for visible heads. But few sever should contains secret changeset anyway. See comment in code for more robust approach. On local repo the wrapper is applied explicitly while the wire-protocol take care of wrapping branchmap call in a transparent way. This could be unified by the Peter Arrenbrecht and Sune Foldager proposal of a `peer` object. An inappropriate `(+i heads)` may still appear when pushing new changes on a repository with secret changeset. (see Issue3394 for details)
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:18:09 -0500 merge: check for untracked files more precisely (issue3400) stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:18:09 -0500] rev 16534
merge: check for untracked files more precisely (issue3400) This fixes the regression, but still leaves the long-standing issue that merge doesn't cope with trying to merge files and directories.
Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:07:29 -0500 revlog: backout e5750c6716eb stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:07:29 -0500] rev 16533
revlog: backout e5750c6716eb This regresses performance of 'hg branches', presumably because it's visiting the revlog in the wrong order. This suggests we either need to fix the branch code or add some read-behind to mitigate the effect.
Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:47:17 +0200 wireprotocol: use visibleheads as reference while unbundling (issue 3303) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:47:17 +0200] rev 16532
wireprotocol: use visibleheads as reference while unbundling (issue 3303) The `repo` object here is *always* local. Using `repo.heads()` ensure we will reject push if any secret changeset exists. During discovery, `visibleheads` were sent to the peer. So we can only expect it to send us `visibleheads` back. If any secret changeset exists:: visibleheads != repo.heads() This fix server side part of issue 3303 when pushing over the wire.
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:04:18 +0200 rebase: preserve mq series order, guarded patches (issue2849) stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:04:18 +0200] rev 16531
rebase: preserve mq series order, guarded patches (issue2849) The previous code was rebasing an applied series like: patch1 +guarded patch2 patch3 +guarded patch4 patch5 +guarded into: patch2 patch4 patch1 +guarded patch3 +guarded patch5 +guarded Reported by Lars Westerhoff <lars.westerhoff@newtec.eu> Also rename mq.series_dirty into mq.seriesdirty, missed by 599a72895c0d, and without effect since mq.qimport() was setting it already.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip