Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:43:50 +0200] rev 19002
largefiles: remove blecch from lfutil.copyandhash - don't close the passed fd
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:43:44 +0200] rev 19001
largefiles: drop lfutil.blockstream - use filechunkiter like everybody else
The old chunk size is kept - just to avoid changing it.
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:35:43 +0200] rev 19000
largefiles: refactoring - use findfile in localstore._getfile
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:35:18 +0200] rev 18999
largefiles: refactoring - return hex from _getfile and copyandhash
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:32:33 +0200] rev 18998
largefiles: refactoring - create destination dir in lfutil.link
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:11 +0900] rev 18997
summary: clear "commonincoming" also if branches are different
Before this patch, "commonincoming" calculated by
"discovery.findcommonincoming()" is cleared, only if "default" URL
without branch part (tail "#branch" of URL) differs from
"default-push" URL without branch part.
But common revisions in "commonincoming" calculated for a branch
doesn't include ones for another branch, even if URLs without branch
part are same. The result of "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()"
invocation with such "commonincoming" becomes incorrect in some cases.
This patch clears "commonincoming", also if branch part of "default"
differs from one of "default-push".
To avoid redundant looking up:
- "ui.expandpath('default')" and "ui.expandpath('default-push',
'default')" are not compared directly, even though they contain
branch information, because they are not yet normalized by
"hg.parseurl()": tail "/" of path, for example
- "commonincoming" is not cleared, if branch isn't specified in
"default" URL, because such "commonincoming" contains common
revisions for all branches
This patch also tests "different path, same branch" pattern to check
careless degrading around comparison between source and destination.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:11 +0900] rev 18996
summary: make "incoming" information sensitive to branch in URL (
issue3830)
Before this patch, "incoming" information of "hg summary --remote" is
not sensitive to the branch specified in the URL of the destination
repository, even though "hg pull"/"hg incoming" are so.
Invocation of "discovery.findcommonincoming()" without "heads"
argument treats revisions on branches other than the one specified in
the URL as incoming ones unexpectedly.
This patch looks head revisions, which are already detected by
"hg.addbranchrevs()" from URL, up against "other" repository, and
invokes "discovery.findcommonincoming()" with list of them as "heads"
to limit calculation of incoming revisions.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:10 +0900] rev 18995
histedit: make "hg histedit" sensitive to branch in URL
Before this patch, "hg histedit" are not sensitive to the branch
specified in the URL of the destination repository, even though "hg
push"/"hg outgoing" are so:
Invocation of "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" without "onlyheads"
argument treats revisions on branches other than the one specified in
the URL as outgoing ones unexpectedly.
This patch specifies list of head revisions, which are already
detected by "hg.addbranchrevs()" from URL and looked up against local
repository, as "onlyheads" to "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" to
limit calculation of outgoing revisions.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:10 +0900] rev 18994
summary: make "outgoing" information sensitive to branch in URL (
issue3829)
Before this patch, "outgoing" information of "hg summary --remote" is
not sensitive to the branch specified in the URL of the destination
repository, even though "hg push"/"hg outgoing" are so:
Invocation of "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" without "onlyheads"
argument treats revisions on branches other than the one specified in
the URL as outgoing ones unexpectedly.
This patch looks head revisions, which are already detected by
"hg.addbranchrevs()" from URL, up against local repository, and
invokes "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" with list of them as
"onlyheads" to limit calculation of outgoing revisions.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:57:16 +0900] rev 18993
annotate: increase refcount of each revisions correctly (
issue3841)
Before this patch, refcount (managed in "needed") of parents of each
revisions in "visit" is increased, only when parent is not annotated
yet (examined by "p not in hist").
But this causes less refcount of the revision like "A" in the tree
below ("A" is assumed as the second parent of "C"):
A --- B --- C
\ /
\-----/
Steps of annotation for "C" in this case are shown below:
1. for "C"
1.1 increase refcount of "B"
1.2 increase refcount of "A" (=> 1)
1.3 defer annotation for "C"
2. for "A"
2.1 annotate for "A" (=> put result into "hist[A]")
2.2 clear "pcache[A]" ("pcache[A] = []")
3. for "B"
3.1 not increase refcount of "A", because "A not in hist" is False
3.2 annotate for "B"
3.3 decrease refcount of "A" (=> 0)
3.4 delete "hist[A]", even though "A" is still needed by "C"
3.5 clear "pcache[B]"
4. for "C", again
4.1 not increase refcount of "B", because "B not in hist" is False
4.2 increase refcount of "A" (=> 1)
4.3 defer annotation for "C"
5. for "A", again
5.1 annotate for "A" (=> put result into "hist[A]", again)
5.2 clear "pcache[A]"
6. for "C", once again
6.1 not increase refcount of "B", because "B not in hist" is False
6.2 not increase refcount of "A", because "A not in hist" is False
6.3 annotate for "C"
6.4 decrease refcount of "A", and delete "hist[A]"
6.5 decrease refcount of "B", and delete "hist[B]"
6.6 clear "pcache[C]"
At step (5.1), annotation for "A" mis-recognizes that all lines are
created at "A", because "pcache[A]" already cleared at step (2.2)
prevents from scanning ancestors of "A".
So, annotation for "C" or its descendants loses information about "A"
or its ancestors.
The root cause of this problem is that refcount of "A" is decreased at
step (3.3), even though it isn't increased at step (3.1).
To increase refcount correctly, this patch increases refcount of each
parents of each revisions:
- regardless of "p not in hist" or not, and
- only once for each revisions in "visit" (by "not pcached")
In fact, this problem should occur only on legacy repositories in
which a filelog includes the merging between the revision and its
ancestor (as the second parent), because:
- tree is scanned in depth-first
without such merging, revisions in "visit" refer different
revisions as parent each other
- recent Mercurial doesn't allow such merging
changelog and manifest can include such merging someway, but
filelogs can't, because "localrepository._filecommit()" converts
such merging request to linear history.
This patch tests merging cases below: these cases are from filelog of
"mercurial/commands.py" in the repository of Mercurial itself.
- both parents are same
10 --- 11 --- 12
\_/
filelogrev: changesetid:
10
00ea3613f82c
11
fc4a6e5b5812
12
4f802588cdfb
- the second parent is also ancestor of the first one
37 --- 38 --- 39 --- 40
\________/
filelogrev: changesetid:
37
f8d56da6ac8f
38
38919e1c254d
39
d3400605d246
40
f06a4a3b86a7
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:57:15 +0900] rev 18992
annotate: reuse already calculated annotation
Before this patch, annotation is re-calculated even if it is already
calculated. This may cause unexpected annotation, because already
cleared "pcache" ("pcache[f] = []") prevents from scanning ancestors.
This patch reuses already calculated annotation if it is available.
In fact, "reusable" situation should be seen only on legacy
repositories in which a filelog include the merging between the
revision and its ancestor, because:
- tree is scanned in depth-first
without such merging, annotation result should be released soon
- recent Mercurial doesn't allow such merging
changelog and manifest can include such merging someway, but
filelogs can't, because "localrepository._filecommit()" converts
such merging request to linear history.
Alexander Plavin <me@aplavin.ru> [Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:29:54 +0400] rev 18991
log: fix behavior with empty repositories (
issue3497)
Make output in this special case consistent with general case one.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:22:29 -0500] rev 18990
merge with crew
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:08:20 -0700] rev 18989
revlog: don't cross-check ancestor result against Python version
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:08:20 -0700] rev 18988
parsers: a C implementation of the new ancestors algorithm
The performance of both the old and new Python ancestor algorithms
depends on the number of revs they need to traverse. Although the
new algorithm performs far better than the old when revs are
numerically and topologically close, both algorithms become slow
under other circumstances, taking up to 1.8 seconds to give answers
in a Linux kernel repo.
This C implementation of the new algorithm is a fairly straightforward
transliteration. The only corner case of interest is that it raises
an OverflowError if the number of GCA candidates found during the
first pass is greater than 24, to avoid the dual perils of fixnum
overflow and trying to allocate too much memory. (If this exception
is raised, the Python implementation is used instead.)
Performance numbers are good: in a Linux kernel repo, time for "hg
debugancestors" on two distant revs (
24bf01de7537 and
c2a8808f5943)
is as follows:
Old Python: 0.36 sec
New Python: 0.42 sec
New C: 0.02 sec
For a case where the new algorithm should perform well:
Old Python: 1.84 sec
New Python: 0.07 sec
New C: measures as zero when using --time
(This commit includes a paranoid cross-check to ensure that the
Python and C implementations give identical answers. The above
performance numbers were measured with that check disabled.)