Wed, 15 May 2019 22:09:02 -0700 bookmarks: keep bookmarks in .hg/store if new config set
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 15 May 2019 22:09:02 -0700] rev 42325
bookmarks: keep bookmarks in .hg/store if new config set Bookmarks storage consists of two parts: (1) the set of bookmarks and their positions, and (2) the current bookmark. The former can get updated by exchange, while the latter cannot. However, they are both stored in directly .hg/ and protected by repo.wlock(). As a result, ugly workarounds were needed. This patch introduces a new config option to store the set of bookmarks and their positions in .hg/store/ but still storing the current bookmark directory in .hg/. The config option only takes effect at repo creation time. It results in a new requirement being set. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6387
Mon, 20 May 2019 10:08:28 +0200 bookmark: also make bookmark cache depends of the changelog stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 May 2019 10:08:28 +0200] rev 42324
bookmark: also make bookmark cache depends of the changelog Since the changelog is also used during the parsing of bookmark data, it should be listed as a file cache dependency. This fix the race condition we just introduced a test for. This is a simple fix that might lead bookmark data to be invalidated more often than necessary. We could have more complicated code to deal with this race in a more "optimal" way. I feel it would be unsuitable for stable. In addition, the performance impact of this is probably minimal and I don't foresee the more advanced fix to actually be necessary.
Mon, 20 May 2019 10:08:17 +0200 localrepo: grab mixedrepostorecache class from 526750cdd02d stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 May 2019 10:08:17 +0200] rev 42323
localrepo: grab mixedrepostorecache class from 526750cdd02d On default, Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> introduced a more advance filecache decorator. I need this decorator to fix a bug on stable. So I am grafting the relevant part of 526750cdd02d.
Mon, 20 May 2019 10:06:53 +0200 bookmark: add a test for a race condition on push stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 May 2019 10:06:53 +0200] rev 42322
bookmark: add a test for a race condition on push Bookmark pointing to unknown nodes are ignored. Later these ignored bookmarks are dropped when writing the file back on disk. On paper, this behavior should be fine, but with the current implementation, it can lead to unexpected bookmark deletions. In theory, to make sure writer as a consistent view, taking the lock also invalidate bookmark data we already loaded into memory. However this invalidation is incomplete. The data are stored in a `filecache` that preserve them if the bookmark related file are untouched. In practice, the bookmark data in memory also depends of the changelog content, because of the step checking if the bookmarks refers to a node known to the changelog. So if the bookmark data were loaded from an up to date bookmark file but filtered with an outdated changelog file this go undetected. This condition is fairly specific, but can occurs very often in practice. We introduce a test recreating the situation. The test comes in an independant changeset to show it actually reproduce the situation. The fix will come soon after. A large share of the initial investigation of this race condition was made by Valentin Gatien-Baron <valentin.gatienbaron@gmail.com>.
Mon, 20 May 2019 07:11:16 +0200 test: properly gate a zstd section stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 May 2019 07:11:16 +0200] rev 42321
test: properly gate a zstd section This part of the test can't run if zstd is not available. This was caught by --pure test (who don't support zstd).
Mon, 20 May 2019 07:11:06 +0200 test: update test for expected test output stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 May 2019 07:11:06 +0200] rev 42320
test: update test for expected test output In 1fac9b931d46 as new test session was introduced. It did not take in account some part that only ran for pure. The test is now fixed.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip