crecord: rewrite a comment about filtering patches I couldn't parse the previous version. I think the rewrite better expresses the intent of that comment.

run-tests: teach _processoutput to handle multiple lines of churn Instead of treating expected output as happening in a precise order, and assuming that if a line is missing it will never happen, assume that expected output is a prioritized list of likely matching lines. This means that if: foo/bar (glob) baz/bad (glob) changes to: baz/bad foo/bar instead of generating: baz/bad foo/bar For which we've lost both (glob) markers, we will match both lines and generate: baz/bad (glob) foo/bar (glob) This retains any special annotations we have for lines.

run-tests: indent _processoutput to aid readability for next patch The next commit will loop over the expected[pos] list, this change makes that change easier to review.

namespaces: fix name/node confusion There was a lot of copy/paste here.

tests: add test for "log -r wdir() -p" (issue4871) The issue has been fixed by 93bcc73df8d5, "cmdutil.changeset_printer: pass context into showpatch()". This patch adds test to prevent future regression.

tests: include modified/added/removed files in "log -r wdir()" output This patch prepares for the test of "hg log -r wdir() -p".