Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:15:10 -0700] rev 37049
hgweb: also set Content-Type header
Our HTTP/WSGI server may convert the Content-Type HTTP request
header to the CONTENT_TYPE WSGI environment key and not set
HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE. Other WSGI server implementations
do this, so I think the behavior is acceptable.
So assuming this HTTP request header could get "lost" by the WSGI
server, let's restore it on the request object like we do for
Content-Length.
FWIW, the WSGI server may also *invent* a Content-Type value. The
default behavior of Python's RFC 822 message class returns a default
media type if Content-Type isn't defined. This is kind of annoying.
But RFC 7231 section 3.1.1.5 does say the recipient may assume a media
type of application/octet-stream. Python's defaults are for
text/plain (given we're using an RFC 822 parser). But whatever.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2849
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:57:43 -0700] rev 37048
wireproto: require POST for all HTTPv2 requests
Wire protocol version 1 transfers argument data via request
headers by default. This has historically caused problems because
servers institute limits on the length of individual HTTP headers
as well as the total size of all request headers. Mercurial servers
can advertise the maximum length of an individual header. But
there's no guarantee any intermediate HTTP agents will accept
headers up to that length.
In the existing wire protocol, server operators typically also
key off the HTTP request method to implement authentication.
For example, GET requests translate to read-only requests and
can be allowed. But read-write commands must use POST and require
authentication. This has typically worked because the only wire
protocol commands that use POST modify the repo (e.g. the
"unbundle" command).
There is an experimental feature to enable clients to transmit
argument data via POST request bodies. This is technically a
better and more robust solution. But we can't enable it by default
because of servers assuming POST means write access.
In version 2 of the wire protocol, the permissions of a request
are encoded in the URL. And with it being a new protocol in a new
URL space, we're not constrained by backwards compatibility
requirements.
This commit adopts the technically superior mechanism of using
HTTP request bodies to send argument data by requiring POST for
all commands. Strictly speaking, it may be possible to send
request bodies on GET requests. But my experience is that not all
HTTP stacks support this. POST pretty much always works. Using POST
for read-only operations does sacrifice some RESTful design
purity. But this API cares about practicality, not about being
in Roy T. Fielding's REST ivory tower.
There's a chance we may relax this restriction in the future. But
for now, I want to see how far we can get with a POST only API.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2837
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:43:47 -0700] rev 37047
wireproto: define permissions-based routing of HTTPv2 wire protocol
Now that we have a scaffolding for serving version 2 of the HTTP
protocol, let's start implementing it.
A good place to start is URL routing and basic request processing
semantics. We can focus on content types, capabilities detect, etc
later.
Version 2 of the HTTP wire protocol encodes the needed permissions
of the request in the URL path. The reasons for this are documented
in the added documentation. In short, a) it makes it really easy and
fail proof for server administrators to implement path-based
authentication and b) it will enable clients to realize very early in
a server exchange that authentication will be required to complete
the operation. This latter point avoids all kinds of complexity and
problems, like dealing with Expect: 100-continue and clients finding
out later during `hg push` that they need to provide authentication.
This will avoid the current badness where clients send a full bundle,
get an HTTP 403, provide authentication, then retransmit the bundle.
In order to implement command checking, we needed to implement a
protocol handler for the new wire protocol. Our handler is just
small enough to run the code we've implemented.
Tests for the defined functionality have been added.
I very much want to refactor the permissions checking code and define
a better response format. But this can be done later. Nothing is
covered by backwards compatibility at this point.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2836
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:53:21 -0700] rev 37046
wireproto: support /api/* URL space for exposing APIs
I will soon be introducing a new version of the HTTP wire protocol.
One of the things I want to change with it is the URL routing.
I want to rely on URL paths to define endpoints rather than the
"cmd" query string argument. That should be pretty straightforward.
I was thinking about what URL space to reserve for the new protocol.
We /could/ put everything at a top-level path. e.g.
/wireproto/* or /http-v2-wireproto/*. However, these constrain us
a bit because they assume there will only be 1 API: version 2 of
the HTTP wire protocol. I think there is room to grow multiple
APIs. For example, there may someday be a proper JSON API to query
or even manipulate the repository. And I don't think we should have
to create a new top-level URL space for each API nor should we
attempt to shoehorn each future API into the same shared URL space:
that would just be too chaotic.
This commits reserves the /api/* URL space for all our future API
needs. Essentially, all requests to /api/* get routed to a new WSGI
handler. By default, it 404's the entire URL space unless the
"api server" feature is enabled. When enabled, requests to "/api"
list available APIs. URLs of the form /api/<name>/* are reserved for
a particular named API. Behavior within each API is left up to that
API. So, we can grow new APIs easily without worrying about URL
space conflicts.
APIs can be registered by adding entries to a global dict. This allows
extensions to provide their own APIs should they choose to do so.
This is probably a premature feature. But IMO the code is easier
to read if we're not dealing with API-specific behavior like config
option querying inline.
To prove it works, we implement a very basic API for version 2
of the HTTP wire protocol. It does nothing of value except
facilitate testing of the /api/* URL space.
We currently emit plain text responses for all /api/* endpoints.
There's definitely room to look at Accept and other request headers
to vary the response format. But we have to start somewhere.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2834
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:34:36 -0700] rev 37045
url: support suppressing Accept header
Sending this header automatically could interfere with future
testing and client behavior. Let's add a knob to disable the
behavior.
We don't have a control for User-Agent because urllib will send
it if we don't set something. I don't feel like hacking into the
bowels of urllib to figure out how to suppress that. UA shouldn't
be used for anything meaningful. So it shouldn't pose any problems
beyond non-determinism (since the header has the Mercurial version in
it).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2843
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:20:07 -0700] rev 37044
util: don't log low-level I/O calls for HTTP peer
`hg debugwireproto` is useful for testing HTTP interactions. Possibly
more useful than `get-with-headers.py`. But one thing that makes it
annoying for mid-level tests is that it logs all API calls, such
as readline(). This makes output - especially headers - overly
verbose.
This commit teaches our file and socket observers to not log API
calls on functions dealing with data.
We change the behavior of `hg debugwireproto` to enable this mode
by default. --debug can be added to restore the previous behavior.
As the test changes demonstrate, this makes tests much easier to
read. As a bonus, it also removes some required (glob) over lengths
in system call results.
One thing that's lacking is knowing which side sent data. But we can
fix this in a follow-up once it becomes a problem.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2842
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:56:41 -0700] rev 37043
rebase: rename conclude[memory]node() to commit[memory]node()
The functions do little more than commit at this point.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2924
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:11:10 -0700] rev 37042
rebase: pass in "user" instead of "ctx" to conclude[memory]node()
This was the only remaining part of the context object that was
needed.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2923