Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:04:46 -0700 scmutil: delegate mustaudit property to the real opener
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:04:46 -0700] rev 17555
scmutil: delegate mustaudit property to the real opener This will be used by an upcoming patch.
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:04:35 -0700 scmutil: turn opener._audit into a property, mustaudit
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:04:35 -0700] rev 17554
scmutil: turn opener._audit into a property, mustaudit This will be used by an upcoming patch.
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:02:31 +0200 perf: add perffncacheencode
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:02:31 +0200] rev 17553
perf: add perffncacheencode Examples (all done with somewhat dated clones I found on my disk): Netbeans (~120k entries in fncache): $ hg perffncacheencode ! wall 4.338000 comb 4.336828 user 4.336828 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) Openoffice (~77k entries in fncache)): $ hg perffncacheencode ! wall 1.533000 comb 1.528810 user 1.528810 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) Xen (~10k entries in fncache): $ hg perffncacheencode ! wall 0.198000 comb 0.187201 user 0.187201 sys 0.000000 (best of 51) Done on Windows 7 x64.
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:00:56 -0700 Merge with mpm
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:00:56 -0700] rev 17552
Merge with mpm
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:28:22 +0200 bookmark: take successors into account when updating (issue3561)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Sun, 26 Aug 2012 01:28:22 +0200] rev 17551
bookmark: take successors into account when updating (issue3561) When we rewrite a bookmarked changeset, we want to update the bookmark on its successors. But the successors are not descendants of its precursor (by definition). This changeset alters the bookmarks logic to update bookmark location if the newer location is a successor of the old one[1]. note: valid destinations are in fact any kind of successors of any kind of descendants (recursively.) This changeset requires the enabling of the obsolete feature in some bookmark tests.
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:28:56 +0200 bookmarks: extract valid destination logic in a dedicated function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:28:56 +0200] rev 17550
bookmarks: extract valid destination logic in a dedicated function We usually update bookmarks only if the new location is descendant of the old bookmarks location. We extract this logic into a function. This is the first step to allow more complex logic using obsolescence in this validation of the bookmark movement.
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:27:44 +0200 checkheads: don't warn about unsynced changes that we ill obsolete
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:27:44 +0200] rev 17549
checkheads: don't warn about unsynced changes that we ill obsolete We won't be able to pull them after this push.
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:25:33 +0200 checkheads: check successors for new heads in both missing and common
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:25:33 +0200] rev 17548
checkheads: check successors for new heads in both missing and common A relevant obsolete marker may have been added -after- we previously exchanged the changeset. We have to search for remote heads that disappear by the sole fact of pushing obsolescence. This case will also happen when remote got the new version from a repository that does not propagate obsolescence markers.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip