Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:31:58 -0500 obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:31:58 -0500] rev 20030
obsolete: do not accept duplicated marker during exchange Before this patch, duplicated obsolescence markers could slip into an obstore if the bookmark was unknown locally and duplicated in the incoming obsolescence stream. Existing duplicate markers will not be automatically removed but they'll stop propagating. Having a few duplicated markers is harmless and people have been warned evolution is <blink>experimental</blink> anyway.
Sun, 17 Nov 2013 13:42:24 -0500 Merge with stable.
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Sun, 17 Nov 2013 13:42:24 -0500] rev 20029
Merge with stable.
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:34:58 -0500 obsolete: stop doing membership test on list stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:34:58 -0500] rev 20028
obsolete: stop doing membership test on list According to the Surgeon General, computer should not use list for membership testing because of the risk of being slow.
Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:45:52 +0900 bookmarks: rewrite pushing bookmarks in "localrepository.push()" by "compare()"
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 08 Nov 2013 12:45:52 +0900] rev 20027
bookmarks: rewrite pushing bookmarks in "localrepository.push()" by "compare()" This patch adds "updateremote()", which uses "compare()" to compare bookmarks between the local and the remote repositories, to replace pushing local bookmarks in "localrepository.push()".
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip