Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 19:23:30 -0500] rev 23577
subrepo: drop the 'ui' parameter to forget()
This no longer needs to be explicitly passed because the subrepo object tracks
the 'ui' reference since
fcbc66b5da6a. See the change to 'archive' for details
about the differences between the output level in the root repo and subrepo 'ui'
object.
The only use for 'ui' in forget is to emit status and warning messages, and to
check the verbose flag prior to printing files to be forgotten. The bad()
method on the matcher still uses the root repo's ui, because narrowing the
matcher doesn't change the ui object.
The local repo's ui was already being used to print a warning message in
wctx.forget() and for 'ui.slash' when walking dirstate in the repo.status()
call.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:26:38 -0500] rev 23576
subrepo: drop the 'ui' parameter to cat()
This no longer needs to be explicitly passed because the subrepo object tracks
a 'ui' reference since
fcbc66b5da6a. See the change to 'archive' for details
about the differences between the output level in the root repo and subrepo 'ui'
object.
The only use for 'ui' in cat is to emit a status message when a subrepo is
missing. The bad() method on the matcher still uses the root repo's ui, because
narrowing the matcher doesn't change the ui object.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:53:46 -0500] rev 23575
subrepo: drop the 'ui' parameter to archive()
The current state of subrepo methods is to pass a 'ui' object to some methods,
which has the effect of overriding the subrepo configuration since it is the
root repo's 'ui' that is passed along as deep as there are subrepos. Other
subrepo method are *not* passed the root 'ui', and instead delegate to their
repo object's 'ui'. Even in the former case where the root 'ui' is available,
some methods are inconsistent in their use of both the root 'ui' and the local
repo's 'ui'. (Consider hg._incoming() uses the root 'ui' for path expansion
and some status messages, but also calls bundlerepo.getremotechanges(), which
eventually calls discovery.findcommonincoming(), which calls
setdiscovery.findcommonheads(), which calls status() on the local repo 'ui'.)
This inconsistency with respect to the configured output level is probably
always hidden, because --verbose, --debug and --quiet, along with their 'ui.xxx'
equivalents in the global and user level hgrc files are propagated from the
parent repo to the subrepo via 'baseui'. The 'ui.xxx' settings in the parent
repo hgrc file are not propagated, but that seems like an unusual thing to set
on a per repo config file. Any 'ui.xxx' options changed by --config are also
not propagated, because they are set on repo.ui by dispatch.py, not repo.baseui.
The goal here is to cleanup the subrepo methods by dropping the 'ui' parameter,
which in turn prevents mixing subtly different 'ui' instances on a given subrepo
level. Some methods use more than just the output level settings in 'ui' (add
for example ends up calling scmutil.checkportabilityalert() with both the root
and local repo's 'ui' at different points). This series just goes for the low
hanging fruit and switches methods that only use the output level.
If we really care about not letting a subrepo config override the root repo's
output level, we can propagate the verbose, debug and quiet settings to the
subrepo in the same way 'ui.commitsubrepos' is in hgsubrepo.__init__.
Archive only uses the 'ui' object to call its progress() method, and gitsubrepo
calls status().
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 22:44:22 -0500] rev 23574
subrepo: use 'self.ui' instead of 'self._repo.ui'
They are now equivalent, but the former is slightly more readable.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:43:01 -0500] rev 23573
subrepo: reset 'self.ui' to the subrepo copy of 'ui' in the hgsubrepo class
Creation of the subrepo's '_repo' object creates a new 'ui' by combining the
parent repo's 'baseui' and reading in the subrepo's hgrc file. This simply
avoids 'self.ui' and 'self._repo.ui' pointing to different objects, which seems
like a potential source of bugs.
Git and Svn subrepos are unchanged, because they don't have their own ui, and
have always used their parent's for their configuration.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:19:38 -0500] rev 23572
subrepo: rename the '_ui' member to 'ui'
The localrepository class has a 'ui' member, so keeping the names the same will
allow for duck typing with subrepo instances when accessing 'ui'. Changing this
is easier than finding all of the localrepository instance uses and renaming
that to '_ui'.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:13:07 -0500] rev 23571
subrepo: drop the '_ui' member in the subrepo subclasses
This member has existed in the base class since
fcbc66b5da6a.