Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:39 +0200 hgrc.5: make minirst find headings correctly
Yun Lee <yun.lee.bj@gmail.com> [Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:39 +0200] rev 14455
hgrc.5: make minirst find headings correctly The minirst parser is stricter than Docutils here and require a blank after a heading. Otherwise the heading is classified as a paragraph.
Sat, 28 May 2011 11:44:27 +0200 run-tests: fix --blacklist (broken by 95715c2f90bf)
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Sat, 28 May 2011 11:44:27 +0200] rev 14454
run-tests: fix --blacklist (broken by 95715c2f90bf)
Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:11 +0200 patch: do not patch unknown files (issue752)
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:11 +0200] rev 14453
patch: do not patch unknown files (issue752)
Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:10 +0200 patch: use temporary files to handle intermediate copies
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:10 +0200] rev 14452
patch: use temporary files to handle intermediate copies git patches may require copies to be handled out-of-order. For instance, take the following sequence: * modify a * copy a into b Here, we have to generate b from a before its modification. To do so, applydiff() was scanning for copy metadata and performing the copies before processing the other changes in-order. While smart and efficient, this approach complicates things by handling file copies and file creations at different places and times. While a new file must not exist before being patched a copied file already exists before applying the first hunk. Instead of copying the files at their final destination before patching, we store them in a temporary file location and retrieve them when patching. The filestore always stores file content in real files but nothing prevents adding a cache layer. The filestore class was kept separate from fsbackend for at least two reasons: - This class is likely to be reused as a temporary result store for a future repository patching call (entries just have to be extended to contain copy sources). - Delegating this role to backends might be more efficient in a repository backend case: the source files are already available in the repository itself and do not need to be copied again. It also means that third-parties backend would have to implement two other methods. If we ever decide to merge the filestore feature into backend, a minimalistic approach would be to compose with filestore directly. Keep in mind this copy overhead only applies for copy/rename sources, and may even be reduced to copy sources which have to handled ahead of time.
Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:09 +0200 patch: refactor file creation/removal detection
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:09 +0200] rev 14451
patch: refactor file creation/removal detection The patcher has to know if a file is being created or removed to check if the target already exists, or to actually unlink the file when a hunk emptying it is applied. This was done by embedding the creation/removal information in the first (and only) hunk attached to the file. There are two problems with this approach: - creation/removal is really a property of the file being patched and not its hunk. - for regular patches, file creation cannot be deduced at parsing time: there are case where the *stripped* file paths must be compared. Modifying hunks after their creation is clumsy and prevent further refactorings related to copies handling. Instead, we delegate this job to selectfile() which has all the relevant information, and remove the hunk createfile() and rmfile() methods.
Fri, 27 May 2011 15:59:52 +0200 commands.remove: don't use workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True)
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 15:59:52 +0200] rev 14450
commands.remove: don't use workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True) workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True) is unsuited here, because it does too much: it also unlinks added files. But the command 'hg remove' is specified to *never* unlink added files. Instead, we now unlink the files at the commands.remove level (if --after was not specified) and use workingctx.forget for all files. As an added bonus, this happens to eliminate a wlock acquire/release pair, since the previous implementation caused acquire wlock release wlock acquire wlock release wlock where the first pair of acquire/release was caused by the workingctx.forget call, and the second by the workingctx.remove call.
Fri, 27 May 2011 17:51:16 +0300 tests: add a test to check for duplicate command options
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 17:51:16 +0300] rev 14449
tests: add a test to check for duplicate command options
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip