Yun Lee <yun.lee.bj@gmail.com> [Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:39 +0200] rev 14455
hgrc.5: make minirst find headings correctly
The minirst parser is stricter than Docutils here and require a blank
after a heading. Otherwise the heading is classified as a paragraph.
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Sat, 28 May 2011 11:44:27 +0200] rev 14454
run-tests: fix --blacklist (broken by
95715c2f90bf)
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:11 +0200] rev 14453
patch: do not patch unknown files (
issue752)
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:10 +0200] rev 14452
patch: use temporary files to handle intermediate copies
git patches may require copies to be handled out-of-order. For instance, take
the following sequence:
* modify a
* copy a into b
Here, we have to generate b from a before its modification. To do so,
applydiff() was scanning for copy metadata and performing the copies before
processing the other changes in-order. While smart and efficient, this approach
complicates things by handling file copies and file creations at different
places and times. While a new file must not exist before being patched a copied
file already exists before applying the first hunk.
Instead of copying the files at their final destination before patching, we
store them in a temporary file location and retrieve them when patching. The
filestore always stores file content in real files but nothing prevents adding
a cache layer. The filestore class was kept separate from fsbackend for at
least two reasons:
- This class is likely to be reused as a temporary result store for a future
repository patching call (entries just have to be extended to contain copy
sources).
- Delegating this role to backends might be more efficient in a repository
backend case: the source files are already available in the repository itself
and do not need to be copied again. It also means that third-parties backend
would have to implement two other methods. If we ever decide to merge the
filestore feature into backend, a minimalistic approach would be to compose
with filestore directly. Keep in mind this copy overhead only applies for
copy/rename sources, and may even be reduced to copy sources which have to
handled ahead of time.
Patrick Mezard <pmezard@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 21:50:09 +0200] rev 14451
patch: refactor file creation/removal detection
The patcher has to know if a file is being created or removed to check if the
target already exists, or to actually unlink the file when a hunk emptying it
is applied. This was done by embedding the creation/removal information in the
first (and only) hunk attached to the file.
There are two problems with this approach:
- creation/removal is really a property of the file being patched and not its
hunk.
- for regular patches, file creation cannot be deduced at parsing time: there
are case where the *stripped* file paths must be compared. Modifying hunks
after their creation is clumsy and prevent further refactorings related to
copies handling.
Instead, we delegate this job to selectfile() which has all the relevant
information, and remove the hunk createfile() and rmfile() methods.
Adrian Buehlmann <adrian@cadifra.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 15:59:52 +0200] rev 14450
commands.remove: don't use workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True)
workingctx.remove(list, unlink=True) is unsuited here, because it does too
much: it also unlinks added files. But the command 'hg remove' is specified
to *never* unlink added files.
Instead, we now unlink the files at the commands.remove level (if --after was
not specified) and use workingctx.forget for all files.
As an added bonus, this happens to eliminate a wlock acquire/release pair,
since the previous implementation caused
acquire wlock
release wlock
acquire wlock
release wlock
where the first pair of acquire/release was caused by the workingctx.forget
call, and the second by the workingctx.remove call.
Idan Kamara <idankk86@gmail.com> [Fri, 27 May 2011 17:51:16 +0300] rev 14449
tests: add a test to check for duplicate command options