tests: deal with "ls" vs "ls -A" difference on 2BSD derived systems BSD-derived systems will use "ls -A" when running as root. Adjust the test cases to always use the flag and include .hg and related output as appropiately. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8397

tests: skip non-readable check for root Trying to check for errors on non-readable hgrc requires UNIX permissions, but still won't work for root. So adjust the check. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8396

tests: skip CVS tests for root It is not uncommon for cvs to check for root and to refuse work in that case. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8395

make: drop the `-c` arg to `install` in the documentation makefile This arg caused `gmake install` on OpenIndiana 2019.10 (illumos) fail with: install: The -c, -f, -n options each require a directory following! install: The -c, -f, -n options each require a directory following! install: The -c, -f, -n options each require a directory following! gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:41: install] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/share/mercurial/doc' The workaround is to run `gmake install-bin`. The man page for 10.14 says this is to copy the file and is only for compatability, as it is the default. The CentOS 7 man page says it is ignored. The top level makefile doesn't use this argument at all, so I'm not sure why it's here. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8439

phabricator: restack any new orphans created by phabsend (issue6045) Previously, posting a new review for a non head commit would orphan the head. The general case is any descendant of the selected revisions got orphaned if this was the first time the selected revisions were submitted. It doesn't happen when resubmitting. I've already had coworkers hit this a few times and get confused. Since posting a review isn't generally thought of as an editing operation, it would probably be easier for new users if we just restacked. This avoids restacking existing orphans around the submission because that may involve merge conflict resolution. Users who already have orphans should know how to stabilize them anyway. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8438

phabricator: prevent posting obsolete commits I don't see why this would be useful in the first place. But I had a coworker submit a single commit that was not a branch head, and the result was to orphan its child and keep the original commit visible. He then did up arrow + Enter, and it happily created a new review (since the URL isn't amended into the original commit specified on the command line) and a new successor, resulting in a local divergence. I'd like to fix the issue with creating orphans, but this is simple enough to prevent on its own. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8437

phabricator: avoid creating unstable children within the review stack The instability occurred when rebasing something that has already been submitted onto something that hasn't, and then resubmitting the stack. Or as the test shows, just resubmitting and including something earlier that wasn't previously submitted. There's a general case here where any children (not just the ones in the range of commits posted for review) should be re-stabilized. But handling the selected commits here will cause the `local:commit` node values that are tracked on Phabricator to be properly kept in sync. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8436