Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20868
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that the format string and "%" aren't placed in the same line. This patch replaces "\s" in that regexp pattern with "[ \t\n]" to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. "[\s\n]" can't be used in this purpose, because "\s" is automatically replaced with "[ \t]" by "_preparepats()" and "\s" in "[]" causes nested "[]" unexpectedly.
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20867
merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 13:27:12 -0300 i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with c57c9cece645 stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@softwareexpress.com.br> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 13:27:12 -0300] rev 20866
i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with c57c9cece645
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:03:39 +0900 i18n-ja: synchronized with e259d4c462b5 stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:03:39 +0900] rev 20865
i18n-ja: synchronized with e259d4c462b5
Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:04:03 -0700 bundle2: support unbundling empty part
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:04:03 -0700] rev 20864
bundle2: support unbundling empty part We augment the unbundler to make it able to unbundle the empty part we are now able to bundle.
Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:00:13 -0700 revset: raise ValueError when calling min or max on empty smartset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:00:13 -0700] rev 20863
revset: raise ValueError when calling min or max on empty smartset min([]) raise a ValueError, we do the same thing in smartset.min() and smartset.max() for the sake of consistency. The min/amax test are greatly improved in the process to prevent this familly of regression
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:44:25 -0700 revpair: smartset compatibility
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:44:25 -0700] rev 20862
revpair: smartset compatibility Since recent revset changes, revrange now return a smartset. This smart set probably does not support indexing (_addset does not). This led to crash. Instead when the smartset is ordered we use the `min` and `max` method of smart set. Otherwise we turn is into a list and use indexing on it. The tests have been updated to catch such regression.
Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:12:05 -0700 revsetbenchmark: add entry for ::rev::
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:12:05 -0700] rev 20861
revsetbenchmark: add entry for ::rev:: Revsets of the form ::rev:: were identified as the source behind the regressions in issue 4201. Ensure we have explicit coverage of that revset.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip