Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:38:28 +0200 merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions
Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> [Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:38:28 +0200] rev 19811
merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions When a subrepo has changed on the local and remote revisions, prompt the user whether it wants to merge those subrepo revisions, keep the local revision or keep the remote revision. Up until now mercurial would always perform a merge on a subrepo that had changed on the local and the remote revisions. This is often inconvenient. For example: - You may want to perform the actual subrepo merge after you have merged the parent subrepo files. - Some subrepos may be considered "read only", in the sense that you are not supposed to add new revisions to them. In those cases "merging a subrepo" means choosing which _existing_ revision you want to use on the merged revision. This is often the case for subrepos that contain binary dependencies (such as DLLs, etc). This new prompt makes mercurial better cope with those common scenarios. Notes: - The default behavior (which is the one that is used when ui is not interactive) remains unchanged (i.e. merge is the default action). - This prompt will be shown even if the ui --tool flag is set. - I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e. to force the test to choose those options). # HG changeset patch # User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> # Date 1378420708 -7200 # Fri Sep 06 00:38:28 2013 +0200 # Node ID 2fb9cb0c7b26303ac3178b7739975e663075857d # Parent 50d721553198cea51c30f53b76d41dc919280097 merge: let the user choose to merge, keep local or keep remote subrepo revisions When a subrepo has changed on the local and remote revisions, prompt the user whether it wants to merge those subrepo revisions, keep the local revision or keep the remote revision. Up until now mercurial would always perform a merge on a subrepo that had changed on the local and the remote revisions. This is often inconvenient. For example: - You may want to perform the actual subrepo merge after you have merged the parent subrepo files. - Some subrepos may be considered "read only", in the sense that you are not supposed to add new revisions to them. In those cases "merging a subrepo" means choosing which _existing_ revision you want to use on the merged revision. This is often the case for subrepos that contain binary dependencies (such as DLLs, etc). This new prompt makes mercurial better cope with those common scenarios. Notes: - The default behavior (which is the one that is used when ui is not interactive) remains unchanged (i.e. merge is the default action). - This prompt will be shown even if the ui --tool flag is set. - I don't know of a way to test the "keep local" and "keep remote" options (i.e. to force the test to choose those options).
Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:10:32 -0400 python2.4: fix imports of sub-packages of the email package
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:10:32 -0400] rev 19810
python2.4: fix imports of sub-packages of the email package These all have an obvious comment so if/when we finally ditch Python 2.4 we can eradicate them easily.
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:16:07 -0400 httpconnection: properly inject ssl_wrap_socket into httpclient (issue4038)
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:16:07 -0400] rev 19809
httpconnection: properly inject ssl_wrap_socket into httpclient (issue4038) This causes httpclient to use the same SSL settings as the rest of Mercurial, and adds an easy extension point for later modifications to our ssl handling.
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:15:43 -0400 sslutil: make keyfile and certfile arguments consistent between 2.6+ and 2.5-
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:15:43 -0400] rev 19808
sslutil: make keyfile and certfile arguments consistent between 2.6+ and 2.5-
Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:15:09 -0400 httpclient: import 4bb625347d4a to provide SSL wrapper injection
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:15:09 -0400] rev 19807
httpclient: import 4bb625347d4a to provide SSL wrapper injection This lets us inject our own ssl.wrap_socket equivalent into httpclient, which means that any changes we make to our ssl handling can be *entirely* on our side without having to muck with httpclient, which sounds appealing. For example, an extension could wrap sslutil.ssl_wrap_socket with an api-compatible wrapper and then tweak SSL settings more precisely or use GnuTLS instead of OpenSSL.
Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:29:00 -0400 sslutil: add a config knob to support TLS (default) or SSLv23 (bc) (issue4038)
Augie Fackler <raf@durin42.com> [Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:29:00 -0400] rev 19806
sslutil: add a config knob to support TLS (default) or SSLv23 (bc) (issue4038) Prior to this change, we default to SSLv23, which is insecure because it allows use of SSLv2. Unfortunately, there's no constant for OpenSSL to let us use SSLv3 or TLS - we have to pick one or the other. We expose a knob to revert to pre-TLS SSL for the user that has an ancient server that lacks proper TLS support.
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:41:01 -0700 largefiles: standardize error message for dirty working dir
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:41:01 -0700] rev 19805
largefiles: standardize error message for dirty working dir
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:31:37 -0700 cmdutil.bailifchanged: standardize error message for dirty working dir
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Mon, 23 Sep 2013 21:31:37 -0700] rev 19804
cmdutil.bailifchanged: standardize error message for dirty working dir This affects rebase, graft, histedit, and other similar commands.
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:53:14 -0700 merge: standardize error message for dirty subrepo
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:53:14 -0700] rev 19803
merge: standardize error message for dirty subrepo
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:50:51 -0700 merge: standardize error message for dirty working dir
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:50:51 -0700] rev 19802
merge: standardize error message for dirty working dir
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip