Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Nov 2019 13:24:54 +0100] rev 43542
index: use `index.has_node` in `bundlerepo.bundlerevlog`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7339
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:20:48 +0100] rev 43541
index: use `index.has_node` in `obsutil.foreground`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7334
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:19:53 +0100] rev 43540
index: use `index.has_node` in `obsutil.exclusivemarkers`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7333
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:17:03 +0100] rev 43539
index: use `index.has_node` in `phases.filterunknown`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7331
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:16:24 +0100] rev 43538
index: use `index.has_node` in `analyzeremotephases`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7330
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Nov 2019 14:00:22 +0100] rev 43537
index: use `index.has_node` in `repo._rollback`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7329
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:49:55 +0100] rev 43536
index: use `index.has_node` in `revlog.addgroup`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7328
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:05:20 +0100] rev 43535
index: use `index.has_node` in `revlog.addrevision`
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7323
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:01:09 +0100] rev 43534
index: add a `has_node` method (API)
The new `index.has_node(node)` is to be preferred over:
`node in index.nodemap`.
This get us closer to be able to remove the `nodemap` attribute of the index.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7322
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 09 Nov 2019 05:54:22 +0100] rev 43533
revlog: deal with nodemap deletion within the index
Since the nodemap data now live in the index, it should be the index
responsibility to ensure the data are up to date.
The C version of the index is already dealing with such deletion.
This work is part of a refactoring to unify the revlog index and the nodemap.
This unification prepare the use of a persistent nodemap.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7321