context: get filesadded() and filesremoved() from changeset if configured This adds the read side for getting the sets of added and removed files from the changeset extras. I timed this command on the hg repo: hg log -T '{rev}\n {files}\n %:{file_mods}\n +{file_adds}\n -{file_dels}\n' It took 1m21s before and 6.4s after. I also used that command to check that the result didn't change compared to calculating the values from the manifests on the fly (it didn't change). In the mozilla-unified repo, the same command run on FIREFOX_BETA_58_END::FIREFOX_BETA_59_END went from 29s to 0.67s. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6417

changelog: optionally store added and removed files in changeset extras As mentioned in an earlier patch, copies._chain() is used a lot in the changeset-centric version of pathcopies(). It is expensive because it needs to look at the manifest in order to filter out copies whose target file has since been removed. I want to store the sets of added and removed files in the changeset in order to speed that up. This patch does the writing part of that. It could easily be a separate config, but it's currently tied to experimental.copies.write-to since that's the only real use case (it will also make the {file_*} template keywords faster, but I doubt that anyone cares enough about those to write extra metadata for them). The new information is stored in the changeset extras. Since they're always subsets of the changeset's "files" list, they're stored as indexes into that list. I've stored the indexes as stringified ints separated by NUL bytes. The size of 00changelog.d for the hg repo increased in size by 0.28% percent (compared to the size with only copy information in the changesets, which in turn is 0.17% larger than without copy information). We could store only the delta between the indexes and we could store them in binary, but the chosen format is more readable. We could also have implemented this as a cache outside the changelog. One advantage of doing it that way is that we would get the speedups from the {file_*} template keywords also on old repos. Another advantage is that it we can rewrite the cache if we find a bug in how we calculate the set of files. A disadvantage is that it would be more complex. Another is that it would surely use more space. We already write the copy information to the changeset extras, so it seems like a small step to also write these file sets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6416