tests: add hghave rule 'setprocname' to check if osutil.setprocname and use it setprocname is not present when we build a pure version. This leads to output changes in test-chg.t This should make test suite green on Python 2 pure build with chg. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8638

util: flush stderr explicitly after using warnings.warn() Due to some unknown reasons, when using chg with python3, the warnings.warn() output is not flushed. Fixes test-devel-warnings.t on py3 with chg.

phases: improve performance of _retractboundary The old version repeatedly converts nodes to revisions, which is a moderately expensive operation. Mapping all new changes once to revisions and back at the end reduces the time spend in _retractboundary during the unbundling of NetBSD's src from 67s to 17s. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8641

tests: use proctutil.stdout.write() instead of print() in test-extension.t I was debugging this test failure on python3 + chg. I get the following hunk as test failure: ``` @@ -206,6 +206,18 @@ Check normal command's load order of ext 4) bar uipopulate 5) foo reposetup 5) bar reposetup + 4) foo uipopulate (chg !) + 4) bar uipopulate (chg !) + 4) foo uipopulate (chg !) + 4) bar uipopulate (chg !) + 4) foo uipopulate (chg !) + 4) bar uipopulate (chg !) + 4) foo uipopulate (chg !) + 4) bar uipopulate (chg !) + 4) foo uipopulate (chg !) + 4) bar uipopulate (chg !) + 5) foo reposetup (chg !) + 5) bar reposetup (chg !) 0:c24b9ac61126 ``` After hours of debugging and head scracthing, I figured out that something is wrong with output flushing. I initially switched the print() statements to ui.warn() but thanks to Yuya who suggested using procutil.stdout.write() instead.

fuzz: tell manifest fuzzer about longer node hashes Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8374

absorb: preserve changesets which were already empty Most commands in Mercurial (commit, rebase, absorb itself) don’t create empty changesets or drop them if they become empty. If there’s a changeset that’s empty, it must be a deliberate choice of the user. At least it shouldn’t be absorb’s responsibility to prune them. The fact that changesets that became empty during absorb are pruned, is unaffected by this. This case was found while writing patches which make it possible to configure absorb and rebase to not drop empty changesets. Even without having such config set, I think it’s valuable to preserve changesets which were already empty.

absorb: preserve branch-closing changesets even if empty This makes the behavior consistent with 'hg commit', which allows to create otherwise empty changesets if they close the branch. A lost branch closure can inadvertently re-open a branch, so it should be preserved.