convert/svn: handle non-local svn destination paths (
issue3142)
test-convert-svn-sink.t still pass and I tested pushing to an svn+ssh
repository
setup: fix build_hgexe for mingw32 compiler
Fixes
python setup.py build_hgexe -i --compiler=mingw32
largefiles: fix path handling for cp/mv (
issue3516)
Previously, a copy or a move of a largefile only worked if the cwd was the root
of the repository. The first issue was that the destination path passed to
os.mkdirs() chopped the absolute path to the standin after '.hglf/', which
essentially created a path relative to the repository root. Similarly, the
second issue was that the source and dest paths for copyfile() were relative to
the repo root. This converts these three paths to absolute paths.
Some notable issues, regardless of the directory in which the cp/mv is executed:
1) The copy is not being recorded in lfdirstate, but it is in dirstate for the
standins. I'm not sure if this is by design (i.e. minimal info in lfdirstate).
2) status -C doesn't behave as expected. Using the testcase as an example:
# after mv + ci
$ hg status -C -v --rev '.^' # expected to see 'A' and ' ' lines too
R dira\dirb\largefile
$ hg status -C -v --rev '.^' foo/largefile
# no output # expected to see 'A' and ' ' lines only
$ hg status -C -v --rev '.^' foo/
# no output # expected to see 'A', ' ' and 'R' lines
$ hg status -C -v --rev '.^' ./ # expected to see 'A' and ' ' lines too
R dirb\largefile
$ hg status -C -v --rev '.^' ../.hglf/dira/foo/largefile
A ..\.hglf\dira\foo\largefile
..\.hglf\dira\dirb\largefile # no 'R' expected when new file is specified
$ hg status -C -v --rev '.^' ../.hglf # OK
A ..\.hglf\dira\foo\largefile
..\.hglf\dira\dirb\largefile
R ..\.hglf\dira\dirb\largefile
hgweb: improve colors for comparison page
delete: red -> red
insert: green -> yellow
change: yellow -> gray
histedit: fix new nodes computation with --continue (
issue3534)
When running the following actions:
pick
617f94f13c0f 1 +4
drop
888f9082bf99 2 +5
fold
251d831eeec5 3 +6
if the fold fails, is fixed by the user with a new changeset, --continue
will ignore the new revision when generating the fold changelog. This
was caused by --continue detecting new changesets as descendants of the
parent not descendants of changesets in the initial list. In this case,
dropped changesets must be ignored.
Even with the computation fixed, the 'newchildren' list was always
emptied by the filtering loop and passed empty to finishfold().
Note that changesets dropped and recreated identically will still be
missed. This probably cannot be solved but is unlikely to happen.
Other things, like 'newchildren' having multiple heads, should be
checked as well.