exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage. This also seems to make the test failure around issue6033 mentioned in 0a7f582f6f1f much less regular on Windows.

extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API) 9.5 years should be enough time, but there were some tests for the old style still (which are now updated). Exthelper doesn't fallback to the old API, so this is for consistency. .. api:: The extension hook ``extsetup`` without a `ui` argument has been deprecated, and will be removed in the next version. Add a `ui` argument to avoid the deprecation warning.

largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper This tests the merge code that wasn't tested in the previous patch.

exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets I think this is what Yuya and Boris agreed on.[1] This happens *after* the extsetup phase now (and after the _aftercallback notifications). But this is trivial, mergeable between exthelper instances, and doesn't need to have the extension name supplied when registering. The test needed updating so that extsetup() takes a `ui` argument, as exthelper isn't trying to be backward compatible with 1.3.1. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-December/125888.html

largefiles: drop the uisetup module This is small enough to live in the __init__ module.

branches: add -r option to show branch name(s) of a given rev (issue5948) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5486