Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:53:58 -0500 largefiles: eliminate an unnecessary import of configitems
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:53:58 -0500] rev 41072
largefiles: eliminate an unnecessary import of configitems Thanks to Yuya for pointing this out.
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:51:02 -0500 exthelper: add some examples for using registrar aliases
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:51:02 -0500] rev 41071
exthelper: add some examples for using registrar aliases Maybe it's my general lack of python knowledge, but how to use these would be way too obscure for me otherwise.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register filesets
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500] rev 41070
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register filesets Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500] rev 41069
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register templates Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series. The LFS extension is updated to provide test coverage. This also seems to make the test failure around issue6033 mentioned in 0a7f582f6f1f much less regular on Windows.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:46:03 -0500 extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API)
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:46:03 -0500] rev 41068
extensions: deprecate extsetup without a `ui` argument (API) 9.5 years should be enough time, but there were some tests for the old style still (which are now updated). Exthelper doesn't fallback to the old API, so this is for consistency. .. api:: The extension hook ``extsetup`` without a `ui` argument has been deprecated, and will be removed in the next version. Add a `ui` argument to avoid the deprecation warning.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:27:43 -0500 largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:27:43 -0500] rev 41067
largefiles: port revset registration to exthelper This tests the merge code that wasn't tested in the previous patch.
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500 exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500] rev 41066
exthelper: reintroduce the ability to register revsets I think this is what Yuya and Boris agreed on.[1] This happens *after* the extsetup phase now (and after the _aftercallback notifications). But this is trivial, mergeable between exthelper instances, and doesn't need to have the extension name supplied when registering. The test needed updating so that extsetup() takes a `ui` argument, as exthelper isn't trying to be backward compatible with 1.3.1. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-December/125888.html
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:51 -0500 largefiles: drop the uisetup module
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:01:51 -0500] rev 41065
largefiles: drop the uisetup module This is small enough to live in the __init__ module.
Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:04:37 +0530 branches: add -r option to show branch name(s) of a given rev (issue5948)
Navaneeth Suresh <navaneeths1998@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:04:37 +0530] rev 41064
branches: add -r option to show branch name(s) of a given rev (issue5948) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5486
Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:06:58 +0000 progress: avoid ui.configbool() lookup when progress bar is active
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:06:58 +0000] rev 41063
progress: avoid ui.configbool() lookup when progress bar is active Profiling revealed that the ui.configbool('progress', 'debug') during progress bar updates was consuming a significant amount of overhead. This commit adds an attribute on progress bar instances that caches this config option. The impact on `hg perfprogress` with default options is significant: before: ! wall 4.641942 comb 4.580000 user 4.210000 sys 0.370000 (best of 3) after: ! wall 1.948626 comb 1.950000 user 1.950000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5) After this change, profiling reveals that progress.progbar.progress() is now consuming ~73% of time. This change does not improve the execution time if the progress bar is disabled. We may want a more comprehensive solution for that case, as the progress bar won't be enabled in a number of scenarios (e.g. servers and processes not attached to an interactive TTY). I also think that overhead of ~2.0s for 1M updates is a bit high. I suspect further refactoring of the progress bar can significantly reduce overhead. I don't have plans to do this, however. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5408
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip