Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:34:20 +0200 flagprocessors: remove flagprocessorsmixin
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:34:20 +0200] rev 42995
flagprocessors: remove flagprocessorsmixin It became an empty shell. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6823
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:26:15 +0200 flagprocessors: move _flagserrorclass attribute on revlog & co
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:26:15 +0200] rev 42994
flagprocessors: move _flagserrorclass attribute on revlog & co This is a small duplication, and the last bit we need to get rid of the mixin. Honestly, I am not fan of that class attribute and it mostly exist to accomodate The simple-storage whose usage of flag processors is dumbious and that is currently dead code anyway. However I don't want to be pulled into futher unrelated cleaning so it is a small price to pay. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6822
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:22:38 +0200 flagprocessors: directly duplicate the deprecated layer back into revlog
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:22:38 +0200] rev 42993
flagprocessors: directly duplicate the deprecated layer back into revlog The code duplication benign and will get removed in a couple of month anyway. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6821
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:16:32 +0200 flagprocessors: make `processflagsraw` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:16:32 +0200] rev 42992
flagprocessors: make `processflagsraw` a module level function One more steps toward removing the mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6820
Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:11:58 +0200 flagprocessors: make `processflagsread` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 07 Sep 2019 00:11:58 +0200] rev 42991
flagprocessors: make `processflagsread` a module level function One more steps toward removing the mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6819
Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:50:32 +0200 flagprocessors: make `processflagswrite` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:50:32 +0200] rev 42990
flagprocessors: make `processflagswrite` a module level function One more step towards removing the mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6818
Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:43:06 +0200 flagprocessors: make `_processflagsfunc` a module level function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 06 Sep 2019 23:43:06 +0200] rev 42989
flagprocessors: make `_processflagsfunc` a module level function This is the first step toward removing the flag processing mixin. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6817
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:53:27 +0200 flagprocessors: writetransform function take side data as parameter (API)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:53:27 +0200] rev 42988
flagprocessors: writetransform function take side data as parameter (API) If we want some flag processors to be able to store sidedata it needs to be actually fed that data. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6816
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:17 +0200 flagprocessors: add a `sidedata` parameters to _processflagswrite
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:17 +0200] rev 42987
flagprocessors: add a `sidedata` parameters to _processflagswrite To read sidedata using flagprocessors, we need flag processors to store them. So we pass this information to the flag processing layer. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6815
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:34 +0200 revlog: add a `sidedata` parameters to addrevision
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:51:34 +0200] rev 42986
revlog: add a `sidedata` parameters to addrevision If we want to eventually store sidedata we need to be able to pass them along. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6814
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:34:03 +0200 flagprocessors: have the read transform function return side data (API)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:34:03 +0200] rev 42985
flagprocessors: have the read transform function return side data (API) This makes it possible for flag processors to -read- flag data. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6813
Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:13:45 +0200 flagprocessors: return flagdata in the main processing function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:13:45 +0200] rev 42984
flagprocessors: return flagdata in the main processing function This function input and return are becoming stranger and stranger bnut I don't have a good plan to make is saner without problematic code duplication, so it will be this way to now. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6812
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:55:04 +0200 flagprocessors: return sidedata map in `_processflagsread`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:55:04 +0200] rev 42983
flagprocessors: return sidedata map in `_processflagsread` Right now, flag processors does not return sidedata, by they will. So, we prepare the caller to receive it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6811
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:41 +0200 revlog: use the new sidedata map return in the sidedata method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:41 +0200] rev 42982
revlog: use the new sidedata map return in the sidedata method So far things, seems logical. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6810
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:54:04 +0200 revlog: return sidedata map from `_revisiondata`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:54:04 +0200] rev 42981
revlog: return sidedata map from `_revisiondata` Nothing extra any side data yet. However, it will happens in the future. So we better prepare the callers of the `_revisiondata` to deal with it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6809
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:27 +0200 revlog: introduce a `sidedata` method
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 03 Sep 2019 22:36:27 +0200] rev 42980
revlog: introduce a `sidedata` method The method give access to extra information related to the revision. Such data will not be part of the hash be strongly related to the revision. Having them stored at the revlog level helps the storage consistency story and simplify various things. Example of data we could store there: - copy tracing related informations - graph structure related information (useful for discovery) - unresolved conflict data The full implementation will be introduced gradually in the coming changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6808
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:35:08 -0700 update: clarify calculateupdate() call sites by specifying argument names
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:35:08 -0700] rev 42979
update: clarify calculateupdate() call sites by specifying argument names merge.calculateupdate() takes a lot of parameters and I get confused all the time which is which. See also b14fdf1fb615 (update: clarify update() call sites by specifying argument names, 2017-02-09). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6883
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:57:16 -0400 bookmarks: remove changectx() method from bmstore (API)
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:57:16 -0400] rev 42978
bookmarks: remove changectx() method from bmstore (API) All the callsites of this method have access to the repo, and I'd rather not have to duplicate this across alternative bmstore implementations. Besides, it feels like a bit of a layering violation. .. api:: `mercurial.bookmarks.bmstore` no longer has a convenience method for looking up changectx instances from a bookmark name. Use `repo[repo.bookmarks[name]]` intead of `repo.bookmarks.changectx(name)`. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6884
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:50:48 -0400 histedit: sniff-test for untracked file conflicts before prompting for rules
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:50:48 -0400] rev 42977
histedit: sniff-test for untracked file conflicts before prompting for rules This bug is as old as histedit, which is more than 10 years! I'm a little sad about the extra calculations here that we're just going to throw out, but I don't see any better way to look for untracked file conflicts and I want the bug fixed. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6882
Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:29:16 -0400 histedit: demonstrate breakage when `update` to a revision breaks
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:29:16 -0400] rev 42976
histedit: demonstrate breakage when `update` to a revision breaks I'm honestly impressed that nobody has hit this in the over a decade that histedit has existed, but here we are. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6881
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:59:29 -0400 rebase: track new nodes when --keep is set
Paul Gossman <pgossman@janestreet.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:59:29 -0400] rev 42975
rebase: track new nodes when --keep is set When --keep is passed with rebase, the new nodes created are not accessible from templates. This change enables accessing the newly-created nodes from nodechanges, just as if --keep was not set. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6880
Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:42:23 -0400 uncommit: fix typo in help text
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:42:23 -0400] rev 42974
uncommit: fix typo in help text Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6874
Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:41:07 -0400 phabricator: use exthelper to register commands, config, and templates
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:41:07 -0400] rev 42973
phabricator: use exthelper to register commands, config, and templates Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6875
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:04:08 -0400 merge: check argument value with if/raise instead of an assert
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:04:08 -0400] rev 42972
merge: check argument value with if/raise instead of an assert This shouldn't make any difference for legal code, but it'll prevent the assertion from being optimized out if someone decides to do -O on our code. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6879
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:02:32 -0400 hg: have `updatetotally` more thoroughly check updatecheck argument (API)
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:02:32 -0400] rev 42971
hg: have `updatetotally` more thoroughly check updatecheck argument (API) .. api:: `mercurial.hg.updatetotally` is now more thorough about checking its `updatecheck` keyword argument. Previously invalid values would have used the configured default updatecheck method, but now will raise ValueError. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6878
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:53:10 -0400 merge: replace magic strings with NAMED_CONSTANTS (API)
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:53:10 -0400] rev 42970
merge: replace magic strings with NAMED_CONSTANTS (API) .. api:: `mercurial.hg.update*` and `mercurial.merge.update` now expect a value from a set of NAMED_CONSTANTS (`merge.UPDATECHECK_*` constants) rather than a collection of magic strings. As of now, the values are the same, but code should be prepared for these values to change in the future. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6877
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:59:26 +0200 singlehead: introduce special handling of closed heads
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:59:26 +0200] rev 42969
singlehead: introduce special handling of closed heads Until now, the experimental option `single-head-per-branch` was also refusing closed heads. The logic is now ignoring them by default and a suboption have been added to refuse them too `single-head-per-branch:account-closed-heads`.
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:57:11 +0200 testlib: allow more argument to mkcommit
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:57:11 +0200] rev 42968
testlib: allow more argument to mkcommit This is simple and handy. See next changesets for usage.
Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:35:34 +0200 singlehead: fix a small typo in a test comment
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:35:34 +0200] rev 42967
singlehead: fix a small typo in a test comment The sentence is now correct.
Mon, 20 May 2019 14:37:38 -0400 examples: add sample fix integration for `rustfmt`
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Mon, 20 May 2019 14:37:38 -0400] rev 42966
examples: add sample fix integration for `rustfmt` Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6873
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip