Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:27:47 -0700] rev 39872
revlog: move revision verification out of verify
File revision verification is performing low-level checks of file
storage, namely that flags are appropriate and revision data can
be resolved.
Since these checks are somewhat revlog-specific and may not
be appropriate for alternate storage backends, this commit moves
those checks from verify.py to revlog.py.
Because we're now emitting warnings/errors that apply to specific
revisions, we taught the iverifyproblem interface to expose the
problematic node and to report this node in verify output. This
was necessary to prevent unwanted test changes.
After this change, revlog.verifyintegrity() and file verify code
in verify.py both iterate over revisions and resolve their fulltext.
But they do so in separate loops. (verify.py needs to resolve
fulltexts as part of calling renamed() - at least when using revlogs.)
This should add overhead.
But on the mozilla-unified repo:
$ hg verify
before: time: real 700.640 secs (user 585.520+0.000 sys 23.480+0.000)
after: time: real 682.380 secs (user 570.370+0.000 sys 22.240+0.000)
I'm not sure what's going on. Maybe avoiding the filelog attribute
proxies shaved off enough time to offset the losses? Maybe fulltext
resolution has less overhead than I thought?
I've left a comment indicating the potential for optimization. But
because it doesn't produce a performance regression on a large
repository, I'm not going to worry about it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4745
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:06:44 -0700] rev 39871
tests: de-flake test-narrow-debugrebuilddirstate.t
If the dirstate gets written much later (usually 1-2 s, depending on
FS) than the working copy file (there's only one), then the `hg
debugdirstate` command will include a timestamp. There's nothing wrong
with that, so we should just allow it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4758
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:39:34 -0700] rev 39870
upgrade: use storageinfo() for obtaining storage metadata
Let's switch to our new API for obtaining information about storage.
This eliminates the last consumer of rawsize() and the opener proxy
from the file storage interface!
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4748
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 11:56:48 -0700] rev 39869
revlog: add method for obtaining storage info (API)
We currently have a handful of methods on the file and manifest
storage interfaces for obtaining metadata about storage. e.g.
files() is used to obtain the files backing storage. rawsize()
is to quickly compute the size of tracked revisions without resolving
their fulltext.
Code in upgrade and stream clone make heavy use of these methods.
The existing APIs are generic and don't necessarily have the
specialization that we need going forward. For example, files()
doesn't distinguish between exclusive storage and shared storage.
This makes stream clone difficult to implement when e.g. there may
be a single file backing storage for multiple tracked paths. It
also makes reporting difficult, as we don't know how many bytes are
actually used by storage since we can't easily identify shared files.
This commit implements a new method for obtaining storage metadata.
It is designed to accept arguments specifying what metadata to request
and to return a dict with those fields populated. We /could/ make
each of these attributes a separate method. But this is a specialized
API and I'm trying to avoid method bloat on the interfaces. There is
also the possibility that certain callers will want to obtain multiple
fields in different combinations and some backends may have performance
issues obtaining all that data via separate method calls.
Simple storage integration tests have been added. For now, we assume
fields can't be "None" (ignoring the interface documentation). We can
revisit this later.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4747
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:27:41 -0700] rev 39868
lfs: drop unused import
A recent change dropped the last user of this module.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4744
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:08:58 -0700] rev 39867
filelog: drop _generaldelta attribute (API)
With changegroup moving to emitrevisions(), this revlog-specific
attribute is no longer used and can be deleted. Good riddance.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4727
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:59:19 -0700] rev 39866
revlog: drop emitrevisiondeltas() and associated functionality (API)
emitrevisions() is the future!
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4726
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:47:04 -0700] rev 39865
changegroup: port to emitrevisions() (
issue5976)
We now have a unified API for emitting revision data from a storage
backend. It handles sorting nodes and the complicated delta versus
revision decisions for us.
This commit ports changegroup to that API.
There should be no behavior changes for changegroups not using
ellipsis. And lack of test changes seems to confirm that.
There are some changes for ellipsis mode, however.
Before, when sending an ellipsis revision, we would always send a
fulltext revision (as opposed to a delta). There was a TODO tracking
this open item.
One of the things the emitrevisions() API does for us is figure out
whether we can safely emit a delta. So, it is now possible for
ellipsis revisions to be sent as deltas! (It does this by not
assuming parent/ancestor revisions are available and tracking which
revisions have been sent out.)
Because we eliminated the list of revision delta request objects,
performance has improved substantially:
$ hg perfchangegroupchangelog
before: ! wall 24.348077 comb 24.330000 user 24.140000 sys 0.190000 (best of 3)
after: ! wall 18.245911 comb 18.240000 user 18.100000 sys 0.140000 (best of 3)
That's a lot of overhead for creating a few hundred thousand Python
objects!
This is still a little slower than 4.7. Probably due to
23d582ca
introducing a type for the revision/delta results. There is
potentially room to optimize. But at some point we need to abstract
storage in order to support alternate storage backends. Unfortunately
that means using a Python data structure to represent results. And
unfortunately there is overhead with every new Python object created.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4725
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:48:02 -0700] rev 39864
wireprotov2server: port to emitrevisions()
We now have a proper storage API to request data on multiple
revisions. We can drop it into wire protocol version 2 with
minimal effort.
The new API handles pretty much everything we were doing manually to
build up the delta request. So we were able to delete a lot of code.
As a bonus, wireprotov2 code is no longer accessing some low-level
storage APIs. This includes the assumption that a node has an
associated numeric revision number! This should make it drastically
simpler to implement a server that doesn't have the concept of
revision numbers.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4724
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:54:59 -0700] rev 39863
tests: use more complex file storage test
The previous test was attempting to to test delta storage behavior.
It didn't do a very good job at it because there was a good chance
a delta wasn't being used in storage.
Let's switch the test to yield a delta in storage so an upcoming
change to delegate delta logic to storage has the desired effect.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4723