Mercurial: Changelog

rebase: pass in entire "overrides" dict to conclude[memory]node() As with previous patches, this was done the same way in both functions, so let's make the caller do it instead. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2920

rebase: pass in "keepbranch" to conclude[memory]node() Both functions calculated the same "keepbranch" value from the "keepbranches" we passed in, so let's make the caller do it instead. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2919

rebase: inline _makextrafn() now that we have only one caller Also avoid even creating a function since we just end up calling it right away. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2918

rebase: pass in "extra" itself into conclude[memory]node() We were passing in a function instead for no clear reason (probably historical, but I haven't bothered looking). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2917

rebase: look up commit message to reuse outside of conclude[memory]node() This was done the same way in both functions, so let's let the single caller do it. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2916

rebase: pass in ctx, not rev, to conclude[memory]node() They both need it and there's no locking that might make the results different, so let's do it in one place. This also lets us move out more common code in the following patches. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2915

rebase: extract common _concludenode() _rebasenode() and _finishrebase() had a lot of code in common. This commit extracts some of that. This means we will also have a single caller of concludenode() and concludememorynode(), which gives us a place to put code that is common between those two functions (which is quite a bit). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2914

rebase: store rebase state after each commit Before this patch, we stored the rebase state early in the processing of a node, before we updated the rebase state to indicate that the node was processed. This meant that we could redo the working copy merge and run into conflicts. However, this only happened in the --collapse case if the rebase was interrupted while editing the final commit message; in the case earlier interruptions, we would instead detect the in-process revision by finding two dirstate parents. This patch moves the writing of the rebase state to after we have completed the revision completely, and, importantly, after we have updated the rebase state to mark it done. This means we'll realize that all nodes have been rebased in the case mentioned above of editing the final commit message of a --collapse. See change to test case. I also moved the writing outside of the large if/elif block in _rebasenode(). This shouldn't matter much, but seems cleaner. One observable effect is if rebase was interrupted just after ignoring an obsolete node ("not rebasing ####, already in destination"), we used to come up with the same decision after --continue too, but after this patch we'll instead say "already rebased ###". This seems more consistent, since that's what we would do with obsolete nodes that had been marked done earlier in the process (not only just before the interruption). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2913

rebase: register status file generator only once when using single transaction rebase.storestatus() behaved differently depending on whether a transaction is passed to it. If a transaction is passed, it registers a "file generator" that runs when the transaction commits. If no transaction was passed, it writes the rebase state immediately. This imprecise timing of the writing makes it hard to reason about, so let's make it more explicit which behavior we're getting by checking if we have a transaction before calling it. For the single-transaction case, move the call to storestatus(tr) early and do it only once since it's only going to write the file (at most) once anyway. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2912