Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 May 2018 18:13:19 +0200] rev 39299
phases: enforce internal phase support
We should not use the internal phase for repository without the requirement.
Otherwise, older clients could have a look at the repository and see the
internal changesets.
For now, we introduce a low-level Programming error, more UI friendly error
will be introduced later.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 24 May 2018 09:59:10 +0200] rev 39298
phases: add a repository requirement about internal phase
For internal changeset to be properly hidden, the client version needs to
support it. So we introduce a new repository requirement that will make sure
clients touching a repository that uses internal phase supports the feature.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:19:48 +0200] rev 39297
phases: add an internal phases
The phase is meant to be used for internal commit that are a byproduct of
command operation (eg:shelve).
This changeset focus on getting the most important feature in, more advanced
API is to be introduced in later changesets.
The phase approach to handle internal has multiple advantages:
* simple to implement, reuse optimized code,
* fits well with existing phases. We don't want internal changeset to be
exchanged or served.
* easy to extend to for lifecycle handling.
More thinking about internal changeset at https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/InternalsPlan
We add this new phases with a high number to leave some room to possible other
phases. We also try out playing with the idea of "flag" for phases, each flag
would convey a distinct meaning. We can drop the flag idea in the future
(keeping the existing numbers). The flag property should still move in a
monotonic direction (enabled -> disabled) or be immutable like the "internal"
flag.
To simplify the addition of this new phase, we introduce many placeholder
phases. They are not meant to be used for now. Keeping `allphases` as a list
ensure existing algorithm works fine.
The full performance impact of adding that many hollow phases is unclear so
far. The impact on phase computation is visible but not worrisome.
Runnin `hg perfphase` in my mercurial development repository.
Before: ! wall 0.001807 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (median of 1597)
after: ! wall 0.001906 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (median of 1521)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 22 Aug 2018 11:58:36 -0700] rev 39296
stringutil: teach pprint() to recognize generators
Otherwise they get serialized as e.g.
<generator object X at 0x
7f543d3d68c0>
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4396
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:03:00 -0400] rev 39295
commitextras: no need to special case extras=[]
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4405
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:01:55 -0400] rev 39294
commitextras: work nicely with other extensions
Before this change, it doesn't add these extra fields when loaded
alongside another extension that does a bunch of things, including
wrapping commit.
I did not investigate exactly why, but
- the documentation of extensions.wrapfunction says to use subclassing
to play nicely with other extensions
- using subclassing does make commitextras work when loaded alongside
my other extension
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4404
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:20:13 +0200] rev 39293
phases: simplify revset in updatephases
(Pointed by Yuya Nishihara)
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:32:10 +0800] rev 39292
context: use new names for unstable changesets in docstrings
Plus slight corrections.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:45:18 -0700] rev 39291
index: embed nodetree in index object to avoid reference cycle
Since the index has a reference to a nodetree and the nodetree has a
reference back to the index, there is a reference cycle, so the index
(and its nodetree) can never be freed. This patch fixes that by making
"nodetree" a plan C struct that the index can embed, and also
introduces a new "nodetreeObject" that is a Python type wrapping the
nodetree struct.
Thanks to Yuya for noticing this and for suggesting the solution.
All tests passed on the first attempt once it compiled (I guess C is
like Haskell in this regard?).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4372
Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru> [Mon, 27 Aug 2018 20:45:52 +0300] rev 39290
catapipe: make the file executable
This silences test-check-execute.t.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4403