Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:29:12 +0100] rev 51496
branchcache: use update_disk to refresh 'served' and 'served.hidden'
The `update_disk` method is dedicated to this kind of usecase. Now that the writting patterns are more consistent, we can use it to warm these two important cache.
I am dropping the first comment about "refreshing all the others" because it is
false. If a branchmap already exist for "served", none of the subset will be
updated.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:25:04 +0100] rev 51495
branchcache: explictly update disk state only if no transaction exist
If a transaction exist the `write_dirty` call will eventually be done and the state will be synched on disk. It is better to no interfer with that.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 03:32:50 +0100] rev 51494
branchcache: do not use `__getitem__` in updatecache
The `update_disk` method uses `updatecache` and the point of `update_disk` is to be able to do alternative processing to the one we do in `__getitem__`. So we calling `__getitem__` in `updatecache` defeat this purpose.
Instead we do the equivalent explicitly to preserve the spirit of `update_disk` (that we will actually put to use soon, I promise)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 05:10:00 +0100] rev 51493
branchcache: explicitly track inheritence "state"
We move from a binary "dirty" flag to a three value "state": "clean", "inherited", "dirty".
The "inherited" means that the branch cache is not only "clean", but it is a
duplicate of its parent filter.
If a branch cache is "inherited", we can non only skip writing its value on
disk, but it is a good idea to delete any stale value on disk, as those will
just waste time (and possibly induce bug) in the future.
We only do this in the update related to transaction or explicit cache update
(e.g `hg debugupdatecache`). Deleting the file when we simply detected a stall
cache during a read only operation seems more dangerous.
We rename `copy` to `inherit_for` to clarify we associate a stronger semantic
to the operation.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2024 04:53:17 +0100] rev 51492
branchcache: stop writing more branchcache file on disk than needed
Before this change, we were unconditionally writing a branchmap file for the
filter level passed to `update_disk`. This is actually counter productive if no
update were needed for this filter level. In many case, the branch cache for a
filter level is identical to its parent "subset" and it is better to simply
keep the subset update and reuse it every time instead of having to do identical
work for similar subset.
So we change the `update_disk` method to only write a file when that filter
level differ from its parent. This removes many cases where identical files were
written, requiring multiple boring update in the test suite.
The only notable changes is the change to `test-strip-branch-cache.t`, this
case was checking a scenario that no longer reproduce the bug as writing less
branchmap file result in less stalled cache on disk.
Strictly speaking, we could create a more convoluted scenario that create a
similar issue. However the next changeset would also cover that scenario so we
directly updated that test case to a "no longer buggy" state.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:49:06 +0100] rev 51491
branchcache: do not copy the `_dirty` flag
If the inherited branch cache is dirty, it will be written on disk, and the
super-set did not need to modify it, the on disk value for the subset will be
re-useable as is. So the super set does not needs to write the very same content
itself.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:52:08 +0100] rev 51490
branchcache: explicitly assert that copy is always about inheritance
This would catch cases where copy is used for something else if any existed.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 09 Mar 2024 02:07:15 +0100] rev 51489
branchcache: stop using `copy(…)` in `replace(…)`
The `copy` method is mostly used for a filter level to inherit the branchmap
from a subset. So we stop using (abusing) it in "replace" to ensure `copy` is
used only for inheritance purposes.
Since `replace` is a method of the BranchMapCache, it seems fine to do lower
level operation there.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 16:47:32 +0100] rev 51488
branchcache: change the _delayed flag to an explicit `_dirty` flag
This is more consistent with the logic we use for other object and it open the way to a clearer management of the cache state.
Now, cache are created clean, cache update mark them dirty, writing them on
disk mark them clean again.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:50:15 +0100] rev 51487
branchcache: write branchmap in subset inheritance order
This way, we can guarantee a valid subset has been written before touching the
branchmap of another filter.
This is especially useful as we are bout to start deleting outdated branchmap
file.