Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:57:52 +0100 dirstate: use wlock and changing_files context in `test-revlog-ancestry`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:57:52 +0100] rev 50039
dirstate: use wlock and changing_files context in `test-revlog-ancestry` This is the way.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:01:59 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `revert`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:01:59 +0100] rev 50038
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `revert` This is the way.
Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:46:22 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `gpg`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:46:22 +0100] rev 50037
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `gpg` This is the way.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:57:41 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `tag`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:57:41 +0100] rev 50036
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `tag` This is the way.
Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:05:12 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `rename`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:05:12 +0100] rev 50035
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `rename` This is the way, unless we are not actually touching the working copy. In such cases we don't need to do something.
Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:08:53 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `copy`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:08:53 +0100] rev 50034
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `copy` This is the way, unless we are not actually touching the working copy. In such cases we don't need to do something.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:29:30 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `remove`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:29:30 +0100] rev 50033
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `remove` This is the way.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:27:57 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `forget`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:27:57 +0100] rev 50032
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `forget` This is the way.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:07:32 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `addremove`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:07:32 +0100] rev 50031
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `addremove` This is the way.
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:57:38 +0100 dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `add`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:57:38 +0100] rev 50030
dirstate: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the change in `add` This is the way.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:51:58 +0100 commit: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the associated `addremove`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:51:58 +0100] rev 50029
commit: use `dirstate.change_files` to scope the associated `addremove` This was significantly more complicated than I expected, because multiple extensions get in the way. I introduced a context that lazily open the transaction and associated context to work around these complication. See the inline documentation for details. Introducing the wrapping transaction remove the need for dirstate-guard (one of the ultimate goal of all this), and slightly affect the result of a `hg rollback` after a `hg commit --addremove`. That last part is deemed fine. It aligns the behavior with what happens after a failed `hg commit --addremove` and nobody should be using `hg rollback` anyway. The small output change in the test come from the different transaction timing and fact the transaction now backup the dirstate before the addremove, which might mean "no file to backup" when the repository starts from an empty state.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 15:38:23 +0100 commit: move the addremove logic around to make the next changeset clearer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 15:38:23 +0100] rev 50028
commit: move the addremove logic around to make the next changeset clearer Lets do the noise now, without changing any thing. So the new changeset can focus on the actual semantic changes.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:46:46 +0100 largefiles: link the core dirstate._changing context to the lfdirstate one
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:46:46 +0100] rev 50027
largefiles: link the core dirstate._changing context to the lfdirstate one This will be much cleaner and safer to make sure the two dirstates are in sync. This way, the large-files dirstate will simply inherit the state of the main dirstate, so if the core code does the right thing, the large-files code should be right too.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:44:27 +0100 dirstate: add a context for tracking files change
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:44:27 +0100] rev 50026
dirstate: add a context for tracking files change Let us start to use it. We will enforce it later.
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:51:45 +0100 dirstate: invalidate the dirstate change on transaction failure
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:51:45 +0100] rev 50025
dirstate: invalidate the dirstate change on transaction failure If the change context lives inside a transaction, the change are not flushed to disk on exit as this is delegated to the transaction. As a result we should also delegate the part that do cleanup on failure. The issue was caught by tests with other change, but it seems useful to fix this as soon as possible.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:16:24 +0100 dirstate: factor the "changing" context logic out
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:16:24 +0100] rev 50024
dirstate: factor the "changing" context logic out This makes it reusable for other types of changes.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:45 +0100 dirstate: introduce a `is_changing_any` property
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:45 +0100] rev 50023
dirstate: introduce a `is_changing_any` property This will embrace other cases than changing parents.
Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:21:34 +0100 dirstate: rename `pendingparentchange` to `is_changing_parents`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:21:34 +0100] rev 50022
dirstate: rename `pendingparentchange` to `is_changing_parents` This is clearer and more inline witht he other change we did.
Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:36 +0100 dirstate: rename _parentwriters to _changing_level
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:50:36 +0100] rev 50021
dirstate: rename _parentwriters to _changing_level We will have context for changing more than parents, so lets be prepared.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:14:45 +0100 largefiles: remove the `changing_parents` context in `openlfdirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 12:14:45 +0100] rev 50020
largefiles: remove the `changing_parents` context in `openlfdirstate` This code might run in any kind of change context, we should rely on the higher level context instead of opening our own.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:57:16 +0100 largefiles: remove the second `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:57:16 +0100] rev 50019
largefiles: remove the second `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles` Now that the `update_file` call have been migrated, we can drop the semantically-wrong `changing_parents` context.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:55:44 +0100 largefiles: remove the first `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:55:44 +0100] rev 50018
largefiles: remove the first `changing_parents` in `updatelfiles` Now that the `update_file` call have been migrated, we can drop the semantically-wrong `changing_parents` context.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 09:25:23 +0100 largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `updatelfiles`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 09:25:23 +0100] rev 50017
largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `updatelfiles` This is what the function is meant for.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:38:43 +0100 largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `synclfdirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:38:43 +0100] rev 50016
largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `synclfdirstate` This is what the function is meant for.
Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:37:33 +0100 largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `openlfdirstate`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 05 Feb 2023 08:37:33 +0100] rev 50015
largefiles: use `hacky_extension_update_file` in `openlfdirstate` This is what the function is meant for.
Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:08:26 +0100 win32text: make the hacky call cover more cases
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:08:26 +0100] rev 50014
win32text: make the hacky call cover more cases Now that I understand what this is doing, It seems like the case for `p1_tracked` were covered by neither the code nor the test. Now the code cover it at least.
Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:47:55 +0100 win32text: drop the `changing_parents` context in revert upgrade
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:47:55 +0100] rev 50013
win32text: drop the `changing_parents` context in revert upgrade We are not changing parents here, so let us not pretend we do.
Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:29:39 +0100 win32text: clean up and clarify the post-revert hack of dirstate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:29:39 +0100] rev 50012
win32text: clean up and clarify the post-revert hack of dirstate The change is unrelated to changing parents and should not be a in a "changing_parents" context. This call is quite hacky, but now it is at least explicitly hacky. We will drop the `changing_parents` context in the next changesets, but we kept this change simple to help readability.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -28 +28 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip