FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Thu, 28 Jan 2016 20:10:06 +0900] rev 27948
commands: advance current active bookmark at pull --update correctly
Before this patch, "hg pull --update" doesn't advance current active
bookmark correctly, if pulling itself doesn't advance it, even though
"hg pull" + "hg update" does so.
Existing test for "pull --update works the same as pull && update" in
test-bookmarks.t doesn't examine this case, because pulling itself
advance current active bookmark before actual updating the working
directory in that test case.
To advance current active bookmark at "hg pull --update" correctly,
this patch examines 'movemarkfrom' instead of 'not checkout'.
Even if 'not checkout' at the invocation of postincoming(), 'checkout'
is overwritten by "the revision to update to" value returned by
destutil.destupdate() in such case. Therefore, 'not checkout'
condition means "update destination is revision #0", and isn't
suitable for examining whether active bookmark should be advanced.
Even though examination around "movemarkfrom == repo['.'].node()" may
seem a little redundant just for this issue, this makes it easier to
compare (and unify in the future, maybe) with the same logic to update
bookmark at "hg update" below.
if not ret and movemarkfrom:
if movemarkfrom == repo['.'].node():
pass # no-op update
elif bookmarks.update(repo, [movemarkfrom], repo['.'].node()):
ui.status(_("updating bookmark %s\n") % repo._activebookmark)
else:
# this can happen with a non-linear update
ui.status(_("(leaving bookmark %s)\n") %
repo._activebookmark)
bookmarks.deactivate(repo)
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 24 Jan 2016 00:10:19 -0500] rev 27947
largefiles: prevent committing a missing largefile
Previously, if the largefile was deleted at the time of a commit, the standin
was silently not updated and its current state (possibly garbage) was recorded.
The test makes it look like this is somewhat of an edge case, but the same thing
happens when an `hg revert` followed by `rm` changes the standin.
Aside from the second invocation of this in lfutil.updatestandinsbymatch()
(which is what triggers this test case), the three other uses are guarded by
dirstate checks for added or modified, or an existence check in the filesystem.
So aborting in lfutil.updatestandins() should be safe, and will avoid silent
skips in the future if this is used elsewhere.
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:24:25 -0500] rev 27946
changegroup: fix treemanifest exchange code (
issue5061)
There were two mistakes: one was accidental reuse of the fclnode
variable from the loop gathering file nodes, and the other (masked by
that bug) was not correctly handling deleted directories. Both cases
are now fixed and the test passes.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:08:20 -0600] rev 27945
log: speed up single file log with hidden revs (
issue4747)
On repos with lots of heads, the filelog() code could spend several
minutes decompressing manifests. This change instead tries to
efficiently scan the changelog for candidates and decompress as few
manifests as possible. This is a regression introduced in 3.3 by the
linkrev adjustment code. Prior to that, filelog was nearly instant.
For the repo in the bug report, this improves time of a simple log
command from ~3 minutes to ~.5 seconds, a 360x speedup.
For the main Mercurial repo, a log of commands.py slows down from
1.14s to 1.45s, a 27% slowdown. This is still faster than the file()
revset, which takes 2.1 seconds.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:32:49 -0500] rev 27944
largefiles: report the missing file count after a commit that does nothing
This is the same warning that is printed for normal files.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:24:30 -0500] rev 27943
commit: factor the post commit status check into a cmdutil method
The largefiles extension needs to set lfstatus for this status call. Otherwise,
if a missing largefile is explicitly named, a confusing message is issued that
says the largefile wasn't found, followed by another that says nothing changed.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:51:17 -0500] rev 27942
largefiles: fix an explicit largefile commit after a remove (
issue4969)
The change in
b68797f244e4 to handle a normal -> largefile switch was too
aggressive in preserving the original matcher names. If a largefile is
explicitly provided by the user, but only the standin exists in dirstate, then
only the standin can be committed.
There's still maybe an issue when the largefile is deleted outside of Mercurial:
$ rm large
$ hg ci -m "oops" large
large: The system cannot find the file specified
nothing changed
[1]
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:48:35 -0800] rev 27941
context: back out sneaky code change in documentation change
In
81b391a45264 (context: clarify why we don't compare file contents
when nodeid differs, 2016-01-12), I also changed "node2 != _newnode"
into "self.rev() is not None". I don't remember why. They are similar,
but the former also catches the case where the file is clean in the
dirstate (so node2 is not _newnode), but different from the "other"
context. This resulted in unnecessary file content comparison a few
lines further down in the code. Let's just back out the code change.
Thanks to Durham Goode for spotting this.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:41:29 +0900] rev 27940
templater: abort if infinite recursion detected while compiling
In this case, a template is parsed recursively with no thunk for lazy
evaluation. This patch prevents recursion by putting a dummy of the same name
into a cache that will be referenced while parsing if there's a recursion.
changeset = {files % changeset}\n
~~~~~~~~~
= [(_runrecursivesymbol, 'changeset')]
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:29:41 +0900] rev 27939
templater: abort if infinite recursion detected while evaluation (
issue4758)
It would be nice if we could detect recursion at the parsing phase, but we
can't because a template can refer to a keyword of the same name. For example,
"rev = {rev}" is valid if rev is a keyword, and we don't know if rev is a
keyword or a template while parsing.