split: add tests which demonstrate the issue5864 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6057

discovery: clarify why the caching of children is valid Yuya Nishihara pointed out that the code looks wrong without this clarification. (And, unsurprisingly, Yuya is right)

tests: clarify test setup test in test-uncommit.t I assume the "hg uncommit b" is there to prove that the working copy is dirty before we try "hg uncommit --allow-dirty-working-copy b". It seems clearer to put that check just before we run the actual test. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6078

tests: fix a stale reference to experimental.uncommitondirtywdir These tests no longer test the config option, they test the command line flag. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6077

discovery: explicitly use `undecided` for the children mapping Recent performance achievements makes the assumption that the `undecided` set is used for sampling. That assumption is always true in practice. We stop pretending that taking anything else would make sense and we directly use the `undecided` set from the object. This provides a more honest API.

discovery: cache the children mapping used during each discovery During discovery, the `undecided` set keep shrinking. Therefore, the map computed for an iteration N will be valid for iteration N+1. Instead of computing the same data over and over we cache it the first time. Our private pathological case speed up from about 7.5 seconds to about 6.3 seconds. (starting from over 70s at the start of the full series)

discovery: move children computation in its own method This clarifies the main logic and starts to pave the way to some caching.

discovery: simplify the building of the children mapping Since we only care about the revisions inside the set we are sampling, we can use simpler code (and probably sightly faster).