bundle2.unbundlepart: keep an index of chunks and their locations In order to make unbundlepart seekable, we need to keep a record of where the chunks are so that we can go back to the correct point.

bundle2.unbundlepart: raise payloadchunks from a closure to a method In a future patch, seek() will need to make a new chunk iterator for the stream; this places it somewhere it can be called multiple times.

manifest: make lru size configurable On machines with lots of ram, it's beneficial to increase the lru size of the manifest cache. On a large repo, configuring the lru to be size 10 can shave a large rebase (~12 commits) down from 95s to 70s.

parsers: use k instead of n for PyArg_ParseTuple because python 2.4 is awful

revset: have rev() validate input by repo.changelog.__contains__() fullreposet.__contains__() will be rewritten in order to support "null" revision, and "rev()" won't be possible to rely on it. This backs out eb763217152a, but there is no performance regression now. revisions: 0) e1dbe0b215ae "l not in fullreposet(repo)" 1) this patch "l not in repo.changelog" revset #0: rev(210000) 0) wall 0.000056 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 48036) 1) wall 0.000049 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 54969)

revlog: add __contains__ for fast membership test Because revlog implements __iter__, "rev in revlog" works but does silly O(n) lookup unexpectedly. So it seems good to add fast version of __contains__. This allows "rev in repo.changelog" in the next patch.

largefiles: set the extension as enabled locally after a clone requiring it When cloning a repo that requires largefiles, the user had to either enable the extension on the command line and then manually edit the local hgrc file after the clone, or just enable it globally for the user. Since it is a feature of last resort, and materially affects even repos without any largefiles when it is enabled, we should make it easier to not have it enabled globally. This simply adds the enabling statement to the local hgrc if the requires file mandates its use (which only happens after the first largefile is committed). That means that a user who works with a mix of largefile and normal repos can always clone with '--config extensions.largefiles=', and the extension is permanently enabled or not as appropriate. The change in test-largefiles.t is simply because the order of loading rebase and largefiles changed. The same change occurs if the order is flipped in the hgrc file at the top of the test.

color: be more conservative about setting ANSI mode on Windows (BC) The current color mode detection on Windows assumes the presence of the TERM environment variable assumes ANSI is supported. However, this isn't always true. In MSYS (commonly found as part of MinGW), TERM is set to "cygwin" and the auto resolved color mode of "ansi" results in escape sequences getting printed literally to the terminal. The output is very difficult to read and results in a bad user experience. A workaround is to activate the pager and have it attend all commands (GNU less in MSYS can render ANSI terminal sequences properly). In Cygwin, TERM is set to "xterm." Furthermore, Cygwin supports displaying these terminal sequences properly (unlike MSYS). This patch changes the mode auto-detection logic on Windows to be more conservative about selecting the "ansi" mode. We now only select the "ansi" mode if TERM is set and it contains the string "xterm" or if we were unable to talk to win32 APIs to determine the settings. There is a chance this may take away "ansi" from a terminal that actually supports it. The recourse for this would be to patch the detection to act appropriately and to override color.mode until that patch has landed. However, the author believes this regression is tolerable, since it means MSYS users won't have gibberish printed by default. Since MSYS's common pager (less) supports display of ANSI sequences, there is room to patch the color extensions so it can select the ANSI color mode if a pager is activated. Mozilla (being an active user of MSYS) would really appreciate this being part of the stable branch. However, since I believe it is BC, I haven't explicitly requested application to stable since I figure that request will be denied.