Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:14:57 +0200 rust-revlog: explicit naming for `RevlogEntry` lifetime
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:14:57 +0200] rev 50412
rust-revlog: explicit naming for `RevlogEntry` lifetime This matches what has been done in `revlog::changelog::ChangelogRevisionData`, and has the advantage of making things clearer when we introduce other, shorter lived lifetimes.
Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:50:42 +0200 rust-changelog: introducing an intermediate `ChangelogEntry`
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:50:42 +0200] rev 50411
rust-changelog: introducing an intermediate `ChangelogEntry` Before this change, client code needing to extract, e.g, the Node ID and the description from a changeset had no other choice than calling both `entry_for_rev()` and `data_for_rev()`. This duplicates some (limited) computation, and more importantly imposes bad hygiene for client code: at some point of developement, the client code would have to pass over both entry and data in its internal layers, which at some point of development would raise the question whether they are consistent. We introduce the intermediate `ChangelogEntry` from which both conversion to the generic `RevlogEntry` and extraction of `ChangelogRevisionData` are possible. It might grow some convenience methods in the future. We keep the `data_for_rev()` method of `Changelog` for compatibility, pointing users at the more powerful alternative.
Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:03:39 +0200 rust-changelog: added a test for `NULL_REVISION` special case
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:03:39 +0200] rev 50410
rust-changelog: added a test for `NULL_REVISION` special case The result is due to `Revlog.get_rev_data()` returning an empty byte string for `NULL_REVISION`, followed by special case for emtpty byte strings in `ChangelogRevisionData::new()`.
Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:24:58 +0200 rust-changelog: made doc-comments more consistent
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:24:58 +0200] rev 50409
rust-changelog: made doc-comments more consistent The most important is the one about `data_for_rev`, that looked like a copy-paste leftover (got me confused first time I read this code, before I actually learned there were both `Entry` and RevisionData`. In the comment for the `struct`, "changelog" was probably more about the format in general (as documented elsewhere) than as an identifier. Some of the "Return something" had "of", half had "for".
Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:47:30 -0400 extras: re-use Projection from jaraco.collections
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:47:30 -0400] rev 50408
extras: re-use Projection from jaraco.collections
Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:21:45 -0400 extras: expose 'retained_extras' for extensions to extend
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:21:45 -0400] rev 50407
extras: expose 'retained_extras' for extensions to extend
Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:17:09 -0400 extras: extract function for projecting names from a gettable object
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com> [Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:17:09 -0400] rev 50406
extras: extract function for projecting names from a gettable object
Sat, 25 Mar 2023 23:02:33 +0100 hgweb: add "children" into the JSON template for a changeset
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Sat, 25 Mar 2023 23:02:33 +0100] rev 50405
hgweb: add "children" into the JSON template for a changeset The children are shown in the HTML templates, so I don’t see a reason against including them in the JSON template as well.
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:43:47 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:43:47 +0100] rev 50404
branching: merge stable into default
Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:19:02 +0100 help: fix formatting for http config section
Julien Cristau <jcristau@mozilla.com> [Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:19:02 +0100] rev 50403
help: fix formatting for http config section
Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:16:14 +0100 branching: merge stable into default
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 20 Mar 2023 23:16:14 +0100] rev 50402
branching: merge stable into default
Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:02:13 -0600 fastexport: rework newline logic
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:02:13 -0600] rev 50401
fastexport: rework newline logic Newlines should only be added when otherwise the stream would look weird without them (on blobs), therefore they are the exception. Flip the logic so they are added, not skipped.
Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:27:57 +0000 encoding: avoid quadratic time complexity when json-encoding non-UTF8 strings
Arseniy Alekseyev <aalekseyev@janestreet.com> [Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:27:57 +0000] rev 50400
encoding: avoid quadratic time complexity when json-encoding non-UTF8 strings Apparently the code uses "+=" with a bytes object, which is linear-time, so the whole encoding is quadratic-time. This patch makes us use a bytearray object, instead, which has a(n amortized-)constant-time append operation. The encoding is still not particularly fast, but at least a 10MB file takes tens of seconds, not many hours to encode.
Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:01:11 +0100 bundle: prevent implicite bundling of internal changeset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:01:11 +0100] rev 50399
bundle: prevent implicite bundling of internal changeset Now that the two mains source of on-disk bundle are preventing the inclusion of internal changesets in their bundling. We can add a lower level check that would prevent any other leakage of internal-phase changesets. We keep the door open to some usage, like the temporary bundle using during strip for example.
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:19:25 +0100 bundle: abort if the user request bundling of internal changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:19:25 +0100] rev 50398
bundle: abort if the user request bundling of internal changesets See inline comments for details.
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:10:19 +0100 strip: do now include internal changeset in the strip backup
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:10:19 +0100] rev 50397
strip: do now include internal changeset in the strip backup See inline comment for details.
Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:00:30 +0100 revset: add `_internal()` predicate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 08 Mar 2023 11:00:30 +0100] rev 50396
revset: add `_internal()` predicate This predicate help core code to select internal changeset (in the internal phase).
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 03:41:18 +0100 strip: drop the assert about bundled revision
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 10 Mar 2023 03:41:18 +0100] rev 50395
strip: drop the assert about bundled revision This is working well, so no need for extract computation. See the previous changeset for the rationnal of still have these assert around for a short interval.
Thu, 09 Mar 2023 15:06:59 +0100 strip: explicitly compute the boundary of the backup bundle
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 09 Mar 2023 15:06:59 +0100] rev 50394
strip: explicitly compute the boundary of the backup bundle We want to make change to the set of backed up revision in a future changeset, we start with a change of the computation without any changes in the semantic to clarify later changeset. The could of costly assert are here to testify that the result is still correct. They will be removed in the next changesets, but I wanted them in this changeset to help in case someone bisect a regression to this changeset in the future.
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:04:10 +0100 outgoing: fix common-heads computation from `missingroots` argument
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 10 Mar 2023 04:04:10 +0100] rev 50393
outgoing: fix common-heads computation from `missingroots` argument When initializing a `outgoing` object, the `common set` can be defined explicitly (with the `commonheads` argument`) or implicitly (with the missingroots arguments). It turns out the logic to compute `commonheads` from `missingroots` is buggy, as it does not consider the parents of enough changesets. Previously, it only considered parents of "missingroots` items, while it need to consider all parents of missing. Here is an example: F |\ C E | | B D |/ A If we use [E] as missing-roots, the missing set is [E, F], and the common-heads are [C, D]. However you cannot only consider the parent of [E] to find them, as [C] is not a parent of [E]. This already fix the bundle generated in one test, and it would prevent many other to misbehave with future change from this series.
Thu, 09 Mar 2023 01:26:04 +0100 bundle: include required phases when saving a bundle (issue6794)
Jason R. Coombs <jaraco@jaraco.com>, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 09 Mar 2023 01:26:04 +0100] rev 50392
bundle: include required phases when saving a bundle (issue6794) We now properly computes and includes phases above secret in bundle, previously, they would be skipped, and then the code computing them would crash. Note that from this changeset, we also include the heads associated with the changegroup's "target" phase. This turned out to be necessary to ensure the movement of changeset included in the bundle, but already known locally. This explain why lines for "secret" heads appears in multiple tests.
Wed, 08 Mar 2023 17:33:33 +0100 bundle: add test bundling changeset in the "archived" phase
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 08 Mar 2023 17:33:33 +0100] rev 50391
bundle: add test bundling changeset in the "archived" phase Having this test highlight that phase bundling above secret is significantly broken. Fixes coming in the next changesets.
Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:23:22 +0100 bundle: introduce a "v3" spec
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:23:22 +0100] rev 50390
bundle: introduce a "v3" spec This is a small update from "v2", we use the freshly out of experimental changelog version "03' format (alignment with bundle version is a coincidence) and we now bundle phases by default. We shall use v3 as the default bundle type later, when changegroup version '03' is a bit more established
Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:43:23 +0100 bundle: add some phase boundary in the bundle type test case
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:43:23 +0100] rev 50389
bundle: add some phase boundary in the bundle type test case Same logic as the previous one, we want the tests to cover richer cases. It actually reveal a bug in `hg bundle foo.hg REMOTE` involving secret. So this is definitly not a bad idea.
Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:21:39 +0100 bundle: expand the graph we us for bundletype/bundlespec tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 08 Mar 2023 15:21:39 +0100] rev 50388
bundle: expand the graph we us for bundletype/bundlespec tests We are about to test more things, especially phase bundling, so we need a graph a bit more complex than a single node. The test "code" was a bit simplified in the process, but no test-semantic changes were made.
Tue, 07 Mar 2023 04:50:29 +0100 revset: include all non-public phases in _notpublic
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 07 Mar 2023 04:50:29 +0100] rev 50387
revset: include all non-public phases in _notpublic We forgot up to update this when new phases were added.
Thu, 02 Mar 2023 04:11:29 +0100 dirstate: remove _actual_file_name methode
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 02 Mar 2023 04:11:29 +0100] rev 50386
dirstate: remove _actual_file_name methode This is dead-code
Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:00:26 -0500 revlog: add an exception hint when processing LFS flags without the extension
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:00:26 -0500] rev 50385
revlog: add an exception hint when processing LFS flags without the extension It would be even better if this was either detected sooner, or the transaction completed (especially since the read/write processors aren't needed for the exchange). But this makes it easier for the user to resolve until that can be figured out.
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:12:23 -0500 tests: drop py36 conditionals in test-bad-extension.t
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:12:23 -0500] rev 50384
tests: drop py36 conditionals in test-bad-extension.t Since this is a `>=` test, it's really conditionalizing py27 content, which isn't a thing anymore.
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:11:05 -0500 tests: drop py36 conditionals in test-hook.t
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:11:05 -0500] rev 50383
tests: drop py36 conditionals in test-hook.t Since this is a `>=` test, it's really conditionalizing py27 content, which isn't a thing anymore.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip