Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:54:56 -0300 merge with i18n stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@yahoo.com> [Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:54:56 -0300] rev 16518
merge with i18n
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:06:17 -0300 i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with 83622954b64d stable
Wagner Bruna <wbruna@yahoo.com> [Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:06:17 -0300] rev 16517
i18n-pt_BR: synchronized with 83622954b64d
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:19:22 -0400 largefiles: notice dirty large files in a subrepo stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:19:22 -0400] rev 16516
largefiles: notice dirty large files in a subrepo Summary and commit use dirty() to check the status of a subrepository, so this overrides dirty() in the subrepo in the same manner as status() to check the large files instead of their standins. Previously, if only a large file was changed in a subrepo, summary in the top level repo would not report the subrepo was dirty and commit -S would report nothing changed. If any type of file was changed in the top repo and only a large file in the subrepo, commit -S would not commit the changes to the subrepo.
Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:47:34 -0400 largefiles: fix status -S reporting of subrepos (issue3231) stable
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:47:34 -0400] rev 16515
largefiles: fix status -S reporting of subrepos (issue3231) Wrapping the status command will only invoke overridestatus() and set the lfstatus field for the top level repository. Wrapping the status function is required to set the field on child repositories. Previously, status -S would report large files in a subrepo as '?' regardless of their actual states, and was inconsistent with what status would report from within that subrepo.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip