Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:50:50 -0700 scmutil.addremove: use iteritems on walk results
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:50:50 -0700] rev 18865
scmutil.addremove: use iteritems on walk results Now that we no longer sort all the walk results, using iteritems becomes possible. This is a relatively minor speedup: on a large repository with 170,000 files, perfaddremove goes from 2.13 seconds to 2.10.
Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:50:31 -0700 scmutil.addremove: stop sorting all walk results
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:50:31 -0700] rev 18864
scmutil.addremove: stop sorting all walk results The only place where the order matters is in printing out added or removed files. We already sort that set. On a large repository with 170,000 files, this speeds up perfaddremove from 2.34 seconds to 2.13.
Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:56:24 -0700 scmutil.addremove: pull ui.status printing out of the loop
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:56:24 -0700] rev 18863
scmutil.addremove: pull ui.status printing out of the loop This will let us stop sorting all the results in an upcoming patch. This also permits future refactorings where the same code consumes dirstate.walk results but doesn't print anything out. An argument could be made that printing out results as we go along is more responsive UI-wise. However, at this point iterating through walk results is actually faster than sorting them, so once we stop sorting all the results the argument ceases to be valid.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip