Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:39:16 +0100] rev 42900
run-tests: remove the artificial indentation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:37:04 +0100] rev 42899
run-tests: extract a `process_out_line` from the main function
The main function doing line comparison is quite complex. Slicing it in smaller
piece should clarify it.
To avoid a huge diff, the code is kept at the same indentation. We'll re-indent
in the next changesets.
(This is a gratuitous cleanup that I made while investigating a bug).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 08 Sep 2019 10:08:41 +0200] rev 42898
run-tests: extract a `process_cmd_line` from the main function
The main function doing line comparison is quite complex. Slicing it in smaller
piece should clarify it.
(This is a gratuitous cleanup that I made while investigating a bug).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 08 Sep 2019 09:42:53 +0200] rev 42897
changegroup: move message about added changes to transaction summary
Before that, applying multiple changegroups in the same transaction issued the
message multiple time. This result in a confusing output:
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 32768 changesets with 60829 changes to 2668 files
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 8192 changesets with 16885 changes to 1553 files
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1020 changesets with 1799 changes to 536 files
adding changesets
adding manifests
...
Instead, we now only issue the message once at the end of the transaction,
summing up all added changesets, changes and files. The line is identical, but
happens sightly later in the output.
There are other suboptimal behavior around issue multiple changegroup (eg:
progress bar). We'll cover them later.
This impact of lot of test as one would expect, but a two pass check show they
are just the order change we expected.
To deal with "under the hood" bundle application by internal code, we had to
take a slightly hacky move. We could clean that up with a more official way to
enter "under the hood" section, however I want to keep this series simple to get
it landed. This kind of change have a very high bit rot rate since it impact a
lot of test output.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 08 Sep 2019 01:02:34 +0200] rev 42896
sshserver: flush stream after command dispatch
I am not sure why this is not working as expected, but without this client might
not see some important output. Without this patch moving some output at
transaction closing time makes it disapear for ssh client in various sitaution.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 08 Sep 2019 00:11:20 +0200] rev 42895
narrow: rely on setting `quiet` mode instead of `pushbuffer`
The `quiet` approach is what `shelve` uses and give the same result. This will
help us to add less code in future changesets.