Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:59:44 +0200 transaction: simplify `undo.backupfiles` file creation with a variable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:59:44 +0200] rev 47422
transaction: simplify `undo.backupfiles` file creation with a variable This make the code shorter and clearer. (This is an opportunity improvement while looking at something next to that.) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10846
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:59:04 +0200 transaction: narrow the error filtering when failing to rename undo file
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 09 Jun 2021 00:59:04 +0200] rev 47421
transaction: narrow the error filtering when failing to rename undo file Having inconsistent "undo" files can be quite serious so we narrow the error filtering to the intent that the comment explain. (This is an opportunity improvement while looking at something next to that.) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10845
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 01:13:09 +0200 transaction: clarify a conditionnal about version check
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 09 Jun 2021 01:13:09 +0200] rev 47420
transaction: clarify a conditionnal about version check Let us move the short branch early. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10844
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 01:14:18 +0200 transaction: extract message about different version in a constants
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 09 Jun 2021 01:14:18 +0200] rev 47419
transaction: extract message about different version in a constants This make the code a bit simpler and clearer. (This is an opportunity improvement while looking at something next to that.) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10843
Wed, 09 Jun 2021 01:12:03 +0200 transaction: explain why some recovery failed
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 09 Jun 2021 01:12:03 +0200] rev 47418
transaction: explain why some recovery failed Right now we issue a message about failing to recover some file, but not why. It seems useful to add some information about that. (This is an opportunity improvement while looking at something next to that.) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10842
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 21:09:31 +0200 copyfiles: deal with existing file when hardlinking
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 07 Jun 2021 21:09:31 +0200] rev 47417
copyfiles: deal with existing file when hardlinking If the hardlinking fails, we fallback to `shutil.copy`, but do not consider future hardlinking doomed. This is a slight improvement from the current situation, we still avoid hardliking in a case we might be able to do it. However this does not have an impact of the rest of the operation. (This is an opportunity improvement while looking at something next to that.) Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10841
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip