Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 15:37:29 -0800] rev 36872
hgweb: remove one-off routing for file?style=raw
Now that both functions are using the same API, we can unify how
the command is called and perform command-specific behavior in the
command itself instead of in the high-level router.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2788
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 20:36:34 -0800] rev 36871
hgweb: port most @webcommand to use modern response type
This only focused on porting the return value.
raw file requests are wonky because they go through a separate code
path at the dispatch layer. Now that everyone is using the same
API, we could clean this up.
It's worth noting that wsgirequest.respond() allows sending the
Content-Disposition header, but the only user of that feature was
removed as part of this change (with the setting of the header
now being performed inline).
A few @webcommand are not as straightforward as the others and
they have not been ported yet.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2787
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 17:02:57 -0800] rev 36870
hgweb: support using new response object for web commands
We have a "requestcontext" type for holding state for the current
request. Why we pass in the wsgirequest and templater instance
to @webcommand functions, I don't know.
I like the idea of standardizing on using "requestcontext" for passing
all state to @webcommand functions because that scales well without
API changes every time you want to pass a new piece of data. So,
we add our new request and response instances to "requestcontext" so
@webcommand functions can access them.
We also teach our command dispatcher to recognize a new calling
convention. Instead of returning content from the @webcommand
function, we return our response object. This signals that this
response object is to be used for sending output. The keyword
extension was wrapping various @webcommand and assuming the output
was iterable, so we had to teach it about the new calling convention.
To prove everything works, we convert the "filelog" @webcommand
to use the new convention.
The new calling convention is a bit wonky. I intend to improve this
once all commands are ported to use the new response object.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2786
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 14:19:27 -0800] rev 36869
hgweb: inline caching() and port to modern mechanisms
We only had one consumer of this simple function. While it could be
a generic function, let's not over abstract the code.
As part of inlining, we port it off wsgirequest, fix some Python 3
issues, and set a response header on our new response object so it
is ready once we start using it to send responses.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2785
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 14:06:58 -0800] rev 36868
hgweb: expose repo name on parsedrequest
I'm not a fan of doing this because I want to find a better solution to
the REPO_NAME hack. But this change gets us a few steps closer to
eliminating use of wsgirequest. We can worry about fixing REPO_NAME
once wsgirequest is gone.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2784
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 14:00:40 -0800] rev 36867
hgweb: expose URL scheme and REMOTE_* attributes
These are consulted by the HTTP wire protocol handler by reading from
the env dict. Let's expose them as attributes instead.
With the wire protocol handler updates to use the new attributes, we
no longer have any consumers of the legacy wsgirequest type in the
wire protocol code (outside of a proxied call to the permissions
checker). So, we remove most references to it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2783
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 12:31:11 -0800] rev 36866
hgweb: remove wsgirequest.form (API)
Now that everything is ported to consume from parsedrequest.qsparams,
we no longer have a need for wsgirequest.form. Let's remove all
references to it.
.. api::
The WSGI request object no longer exposes a ``form`` attribute
containing parsed query string data. Use the ``qsparams`` attribute
instead.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2782
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Mar 2018 12:36:36 -0800] rev 36865
hgweb: perform all parameter lookup via qsparams
I think I managed to update all call sites using wsgirequest.form
to use parsedrequest.qsparams.
Since behavior of qsparams is to retrieve last value, behavior will
change if a parameter was specified multiple times. But I think this
is acceptable.
I'm not a fan of the `req.req.qsparams` pattern. And some of the
modified code could be written better. But I was aiming for a
straight port with this change. Cleanup can come later.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2781