Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:41:23 +0900 templatekw: add new-style template expansion to {manifest}
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:41:23 +0900] rev 34330
templatekw: add new-style template expansion to {manifest} The goal is to allow us to easily access to nested data. The dot operator will be introduced later so we can write '{p1.files}' instead of '{revset("p1()") % "{files}"}' for example. In the example above, 'p1' needs to carry a mapping dict along with its string representation. If it were a list or a dict, it could be wrapped semi-transparently with the _hybrid class, but for non-list/dict types, it would be difficult to proxy all necessary functions to underlying value type because several core operations may conflict with the ones of the underlying value: - hash(value) should be different from hash(wrapped(value)), which means dict[wrapped(value)] would be invalid - 'value == wrapped(value)' would be false, breaks 'ifcontains' - len(wrapped(value)) may be either len(value) or len(iter(wrapped(value))) So the wrapper has no proxy functions and its scope designed to be minimal. It's unwrapped at eval*() functions so we don't have to care for a wrapped object unless it's really needed: # most template functions just call evalfuncarg() unwrapped_value = evalfuncarg(context, mapping, args[n]) # if wrapped value is needed, use evalrawexp() maybe_wrapped_value = evalrawexp(context, mapping, args[n]) Another idea was to wrap every template variable with a tagging class, but which seemed uneasy without a static type checker. This patch updates {manifest} to a mappable as an example.
Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:37:11 +0900 templater: adjust binding strength of '%' and '|' operators (BC)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:37:11 +0900] rev 34329
templater: adjust binding strength of '%' and '|' operators (BC) This makes 'foo|bar%baz' parsed as '(foo|bar)%baz', not 'foo|(bar%baz)'. Perhaps it was a mistake that '%' preceded '|'. Both '|' and '%' can be considered a kind of function application, and '|' is more like a '.' operator seen in OO languages. So IMHO '|' should have the same (or higher) binding as '%'. The BC breakage should be minimal since both '|' and '%' operators have strict requirements for their operands and 'foo|bar%baz' was invalid: - right-hand side of '|' must be a symbol - left-hand side of '%' must be a dict or list - right-hand side of '%' must be a string or symbol
Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:22:46 +0900 templatekw: just pass underlying value (or key) to joinfmt() function
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:22:46 +0900] rev 34328
templatekw: just pass underlying value (or key) to joinfmt() function Before, iter(hybrid) was proxied to hybrid.gen, which generated formatted strings. That's why we had to apply joinfmt() to the dicts generated by hybrid.itermaps(). Since this weird API was fixed at a0f2d83f8083, we can get rid of the makemap() calls from join().
Sun, 24 Sep 2017 12:43:57 +0900 scmutil: extract helper functions that returns human-readable change id
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 24 Sep 2017 12:43:57 +0900] rev 34327
scmutil: extract helper functions that returns human-readable change id We do "'%d:%s' % (ctx...)" at several places, so let's formalize it. A low- level function, formatrevnode(ui, rev, node), is extracted so we can pass a manifest rev/node pair. Note that hex() for manifest output can be replaced with hexfunc() because it is printed only when debugflag is set. i18n/de.po is updated so test-log.t passes with no error.
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:13:54 +0900 templater: extract helper to just evaluate template expression
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:13:54 +0900] rev 34326
templater: extract helper to just evaluate template expression A named function can be easily grepped and is probably good for code readability.
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:09:34 +0900 templater: do not destructure operands in buildmap()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:09:34 +0900] rev 34325
templater: do not destructure operands in buildmap() This makes the next patch slightly simpler.
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:01:18 +0900 templater: use helper function to get name of non-iterable keyword
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:01:18 +0900] rev 34324
templater: use helper function to get name of non-iterable keyword
Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:55:01 +0200 pull: remove inadequate use of operations records to update stepdone
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:55:01 +0200] rev 34323
pull: remove inadequate use of operations records to update stepdone The 'stepdone' set is design to be a client side mechanism. If the client used some advanced capabilities to request necessary information (changeset, obsmarkers, phases, etc). It marks the steps as done to avoid having a less advanced mechanism issue a duplicated request. So, the "stepdone.add('phases')" should be the result of a client choice, because only the client can know it has requested all it needed to request. In 4a08cf1a2cfe this principle was broken because any phase-heads part sent by the server to the client would declare the phases retrieval complete. Now that there is an official phases related capability and code associated to it. We do not need the change in 4a08cf1a2cfe anymore and we can back it out. This brings back 'stepdone' management for 'phases' in line with the rest of the code (including other phases handing). Here is an example of potential misbehavior that 4a08cf1a2cfe introduced: Imagine a server that pre-computes bundles. The bundles contains a changegroup part and an (advisory) 'phase-heads' part. When a pull occurs, precomputed bundled are reused if available. As the phase part is advisory it can be sent to all clients. However they could be relevant changesets without phase information. Either because they are already common or because they had no precomputed bundle for them yet. If receiving any 'phase-heads' parts disable subsequent phases re-trivial parts, the client will not request phase data for all relevant changesets. For example common changesets will not turn public.
Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:27:18 +0200 pull: use 'phase-heads' to retrieve phase information
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:27:18 +0200] rev 34322
pull: use 'phase-heads' to retrieve phase information A new bundle2 capability 'phases' has been added. If 'heads' is part of the supported value for 'phases', the server supports reading and sending 'phase- heads' bundle2 part. Server is now able to process a 'phases' boolean parameter to 'getbundle'. If 'True', a 'phase-heads' bundle2 part will be included in the bundle with phase information relevant to the whole pulled set. If this method is available the phases listkey namespace will no longer be listed. Beside the more efficient encoding of the data, this new method will greatly improve the phase exchange efficiency for repositories with non-served changesets (obsolete, secret) since we'll no longer send data about the filtered heads. Add a new 'devel.legacy.exchange' config item to allow fallback to the old 'listkey in bundle2' method. Reminder: the pulled set is not just the changesets bundled by the pull. It also contains changeset selected by the "pull specification" on the client side (eg: everything for bare pull). One of the reason why the 'pulled set' is important is to make sure we can move -common- nodes to public.
Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:29:10 +0200 bundle2: only grab a transaction when 'phase-heads' affect the repository
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:29:10 +0200] rev 34321
bundle2: only grab a transaction when 'phase-heads' affect the repository The next patch will use the 'phase-heads' part to exchange phase data relevant to the pulled set. 'handlephases' currently acquires a transaction even in case of no-op pull, which would results in an empty transaction and messing with the existing journal. Pass the transaction fetcher to updatephases so it can fetch it if necessary.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip