Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:39 +0100] rev 49747
clone: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer
Instead of having `peer()` method on all `peer()` for this usecase, we could
simply handle it explicitly.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:15:04 +0100] rev 49746
addbranchrevs: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer
Instead of having `peer()` method on all `peer()` for this usecase, we could
simply handle it explicitly.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:01:54 +0100] rev 49745
path: pass `path` to `peer` in `hg clone`
We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:49:54 +0100] rev 49744
path: use `get_clone_path_obj` in share
The return is simpler to use, and this mean less user for the old function.
We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:42:36 +0100] rev 49743
path: pass `path` to `peer` in mq
We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object.
There is one case where we don't. We should fix that at the same time as we fix
the sub-repo cases.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:36:43 +0100] rev 49742
path: use `get_clone_path_obj` in _getlocal
We don't need to feed the `path` object to a `peer` object, but using an higher
level function is simpler here (e.g. no subscript access, explicit attribute
access).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:34:00 +0100] rev 49741
path: pass `path` to `peer` in `hg init`
We directly use the `path` object to build the `peer` object.