Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:16:01 +0100 bundlerepo: don't return the peer without bundlerepo from getremotechanges stable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Fri, 28 Dec 2012 11:16:01 +0100] rev 18138
bundlerepo: don't return the peer without bundlerepo from getremotechanges Problem: getremotechanges would return the 'other' repo if nothing was incoming and there thus wasn't any bundle to base the repo on. The 'other' could be a http peer which only implement the functionality available over the http protocol. Transplant could thus fail with TypeError: argument of type 'httppeer' is not iterable Solution: Return the local repo instead of the remote peer if there is no reason to place a bundlerepo on top of the local repo.
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:02:40 +0100 strip: do not update branchcache during strip (issue3745)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:02:40 +0100] rev 18137
strip: do not update branchcache during strip (issue3745) At this moment, the cache is invalid, and will be thrown away. Later the strip function will call the `localrepo.destroyed` method that will update the branchmap cache.
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:04:07 -0800 copies: do not track backward copies, only renames (issue3739)
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:04:07 -0800] rev 18136
copies: do not track backward copies, only renames (issue3739) The inverse of a rename is a rename, but the inverse of a copy is not a copy. Presenting it as such -- in particular, stuffing it into the same dict as real copies -- causes bugs because other code starts believing the inverse copies are real. The only test whose output changes is test-mv-cp-st-diff.t. When a backwards status -C command is run where a copy is involved, the inverse copy (which was hitherto presented as a real copy) is no longer displayed. Keeping track of inverse copies is useful in some situations -- composability of diffs, for example, since adding "a" followed by an inverse copy "b" to "a" is equivalent to a rename "b" to "a". However, representing them would require a more complex data structure than the same dict in which real copies are also stored.
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:03:58 -0800 copies: make debug messages more sensible
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:03:58 -0800] rev 18135
copies: make debug messages more sensible The -> in debug messages is currently overloaded to mean both source to dest and dest to source. To fix this, we add explicit labels and make the arrow direction consistent.
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:50:17 -0800 copies: separate moves via directory renames from explicit copies
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:50:17 -0800] rev 18134
copies: separate moves via directory renames from explicit copies Currently the "copy" dict contains both explicit copies/moves made by a context and pending moves that need to happen because the other context moved the directory the file was in. For explicit copies, the dict stores a destination to source map, while for pending moves via directory renames, it stores a source to destination map. The merge code uses this fact in a non- obvious way to differentiate between these two cases. We make this explicit by storing these pending moves in a separate dict. The dict still has a source to destination map, but that is called out in the docstring.
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:16:18 -0600 merge with stable
Kevin Bullock <kbullock@ringworld.org> [Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:16:18 -0600] rev 18133
merge with stable
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:49:59 +0100 branchmap: move validity logic in the object itself
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 24 Dec 2012 02:49:59 +0100] rev 18132
branchmap: move validity logic in the object itself In several place, We check if a branchcache is still valid regarding the current state of the repository. This changeset puts this logic in a method of the object that can be reused when necessary. A branch map is considered valid whenever it is up to date or a strict subset of the repository state. The change will help making branchcache aware of filtered revision. The change in keyword is expected. the branch cache is actually invalid after the amend. The previous check did not detected it.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip