Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 18 Dec 2017 20:51:20 -0800] rev 35715
githelp: improve help for `git add`
The old code was referencing record and crecord, which are
deprecated. `hg commit --interactive` is the preferred mechanism
to use.
In addition, there was duplicate code in this function. It has
been removed.
Tests have been added to cover this function.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1723
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 18 Dec 2017 20:44:59 -0800] rev 35714
githelp: vendor Facebook authored extension
This commit vendors the Facebook-authored "githelp" extension. This
extension provides a "githelp" command that can be used to try to
convert a `git` command to its Mercurial equivalent. This functionality
is useful for Git users learning Mercurial.
The extension was copied from the
repository at revision
32ceeccb832c433b36e9af8196814b8e5a526775. The
following modifications were made:
* The "testedwith" value has been changed to match core's conventions.
* Support for a custom footer has been removed, as it is Facebook
specific. The feature is useful. But the implementation wasn't
appropriate for core.
* A test referencing "tweakdefaults" has been removed.
* Imports changed to match Mercurial's style convention.
* Double newlines in test removed.
* Pager activation changed to ui.pager().
* Initial line of githelp.py changed to add description of file.
The removal of the custom footer code was the only significant
source change. The rest were mostly cosmetic.
There are still some Facebook-isms in the extension. I'll address
these as follow-ups.
.. feature:: githelp extension
The "githelp" extension provides the ``hg githelp`` command. This
command attempts to convert a ``git`` command to its Mercurial
equivalent. The extension can be useful to Git users new to
Mercurial.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1722
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 18 Jan 2018 19:40:17 +0530] rev 35713
merge: use public interface ms.localctx instead of ms._local
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:28:57 +0100] rev 35712
bookmarks: display the obsfate of hidden revision we create a bookmark on
Display the same message we added recently to the filtered error message
create a bookmark on an hidden revision.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1870
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:08:54 +0100] rev 35711
update: display the obsfate of hidden revision we update to
Display the same message we added recently to the filtered error message when
updating to a hidden obsolete changeset.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1869
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 14 Jan 2018 00:02:40 -0800] rev 35710
evolution: make reporting of new unstable changesets optional
This makes it possible to turn off the reporting of unstable
changesets (e.g. "1 new orphan changesets"), just in case it's too
slow for some users. Anyone who's been using the evolve extension has
already been accepting the cost of the reporting, so this is just for
the few users who have turned on obsmarkers but not been using the
evolve extension (as I believe Facebook has).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1868
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:59:17 -0800] rev 35709
evolution: report new unstable changesets
This adds a transaction summary callback that reports the number of
new orphan, content-divergent and phase-divergent changesets.
The code for reporting it is based on the code from the evolve
extension, but simplified a bit. It simply counts the numbers for each
kind of instability before and after the transaction. That's obviously
not very efficient, but it's easy to reason about, so I'm doing this
as a first step that can make us quite confident about the test case
changes. We can optimize it later and make sure that the tests are not
affected. The code has been used in the evolve extension for a long
time and has apparently been sufficiently fast, so it doesn't seem
like a pressing issue.
Unlike the evolve extension's version of this report, this version
applies to all commands (or all transactions run as part of any
command, to be exact).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1867
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:00:23 -0800] rev 35708
transaction: register summary callbacks only at start of transaction (BC)
We currently register summary callbacks every time
localrepo.transaction() is called, so both when the transaction is
started and when a nested transaction is created. That seems a little
weirdly asymmetric, because the summary callbacks are thus not
necessarily registred at the beginning of the outermost transaction,
but they are only called when the outermost transaction closes (not
when a nested transaction closes).
I want to add another summary callback that records the repo state at
the beginning of the transaction and compares to that when the
transaction closes. However, because of the registration that happens
when a nested transaction is created, that would need to go through
extra trouble to not overwrite the callback and report the difference
from the start time of the innermost transaction to the close of the
outermost transaction.
Also, the callbacks are registered with a name based on the order they
are defined in the registersummarycallback(). For example, if both the
"new changesets %s" and the "obsoleted %i changesets" hooks are
registered, the first would be called 00-txnreport and the second
would be called 01-txnreport. That gets really weird if
registersummarycallback() gets called multiple times, because the last
one wins, and a depending on which of the two callbacks get
registered, we might hypothetically even overwrite on type of callback
with another. For example, if when the outer transaction was started,
we registered the "new changesets %s" callback first, and when the
inner transaction was started, we registered only the "obsoleted %i
changesets" callback, then only the latter message would get
printed. What makes it hypothetical is that what gets registered
depends on the transaction name, and the set of transaction names that
we match on for the former latter message is a subset of the set of
names we match on for the former. Still, that seems like a bug waiting
to happen.
That second issue could be solved independently, but the first issue
seems enough for me to consider it a bug (affecting developers, not
users), so this patch simply drops that extra registration.
Note that this affects "hg transplant" in a user-visible way. When "hg
transplant" is asked to transplant from a remote repo so it involves a
pull, then the outermost transaction name is "transplant" and an inner
transaction is created for "pull". That inner transaction is what led
us to sometimes report "new changesets %s" from "hg transplant". After
this patch, that no longer happens. That seems fine to me. We can make
it instead print the message for all "hg transplant" invocations if we
want (not just those involving a remote), but I'll leave that for
someone else to do if they think it's important.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1866
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:39:17 -0800] rev 35707
repair: filter out unknown revisions from phasecache within transaction
I'm about to add another summary report callback that needs to access
phase information. These callbacks run at the end of the transaction
and some of them failed because they tried to get the phase for
stripped commits. The solution is to filter out unknown revisions
before the transaction is closed.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1865
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:37:06 -0800] rev 35706
repair: drop unnecessary phase cache invalidation
After stripping the revlogs, we have been invalidating the phase cache
since
bf7b8157c483. Later, in
8e3021fd1a44, I added a call to
phasecache.filterunknown(). I apparently didn't realize it then, but I
now think that that call made the existing phasecache.invalidate()
call unnecessary, so this patch drops it. Both the test added in
bf7b8157c483 and the entire evolve extension test suite indeed still
pass.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1864