Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:49:26 -0700 revset: remove nullrev from set computed in parents()
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:49:26 -0700] rev 22497
revset: remove nullrev from set computed in parents() The old code relied on the subset contents to get rid of invalid values. We would like to be able to rely more on the computation in parents() so we filter out the invalid value.
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:44:03 -0700 revset: refactor parents() into a single return point
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:44:03 -0700] rev 22496
revset: refactor parents() into a single return point Both paths are doing similar thing in the end. We refactor the function so that the `ps` set is commonly used at the end. This will end excluding `nullrev` from this set in a future patch
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:40:30 -0700 revset: remove nullrev from set computed in p1() and p2()
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:40:30 -0700] rev 22495
revset: remove nullrev from set computed in p1() and p2() The old code relied on the subset contents to get rid of invalid values. We would like to be able to rely more on the computation in p1() and p2() so we filter out the invalid value
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:42:41 -0700 revset: document the choice made in __generatorset.__iter__
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:42:41 -0700] rev 22494
revset: document the choice made in __generatorset.__iter__ The method code looks a bit ugly but has good reasons to. We document them to prevent naive refactoring in the future.
Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:31:34 -0500 help: mention mode in hg log --removed help (issue4381) stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:31:34 -0500] rev 22493
help: mention mode in hg log --removed help (issue4381)
Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:07:06 -0500 commit: catch changed exec bit on files from p1 (issue4382) stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:07:06 -0500] rev 22492
commit: catch changed exec bit on files from p1 (issue4382)
Sat, 30 Aug 2014 02:25:23 +0200 revert: add a `drop` action
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 30 Aug 2014 02:25:23 +0200] rev 22491
revert: add a `drop` action This prevents the need for a try except in the `_performrevert` code.
Sat, 30 Aug 2014 02:23:25 +0200 revert: explicitly track added but deleted file
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 30 Aug 2014 02:23:25 +0200] rev 22490
revert: explicitly track added but deleted file Added + deleted file are files that need to be untracked from the dirstate but that are already missing on disk. The current `_performrevert` code is handling that with exception catching. We will be able to do better with a dedicated set.
Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:36:48 +0200 revert: have an explicit action for "forget"
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:36:48 +0200] rev 22489
revert: have an explicit action for "forget" The distinction between "remove" and "forget" used to be in special logic checking for the state of the file in the dirstate. Now that we have dedicated filtering, we can stop relying on this logic and have two distinct actions.
Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:20:29 +0200 revert: split between newly added file and file added in other changeset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:20:29 +0200] rev 22488
revert: split between newly added file and file added in other changeset These two kinds of files are handled differently. One is deleted and the other is just forgotten (the file is untracked but left in place). The distinction is done in the `_performrevert` code itself and we would like to get ride of this.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip