Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:48:18 +0530 rebase: remove unused variable "release" and an extra blank line
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:48:18 +0530] rev 38681
rebase: remove unused variable "release" and an extra blank line Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3947
Sat, 14 Jul 2018 23:00:22 +0530 rebase: remove unnecessary confirm block
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Jul 2018 23:00:22 +0530] rev 38680
rebase: remove unnecessary confirm block Removed unnecessary 'if confirm:' block as that thing is now handled at 'finally'. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3945
Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:59:42 +0530 rebase: in --confirm option just abort if hit a conflict
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Jul 2018 08:59:42 +0530] rev 38679
rebase: in --confirm option just abort if hit a conflict Before this patch, it was prompting the user in both cases 1) when there is no conflict 2) when there is at least one conflict. But for simplicity we can just abort if we hit a conflict and no need to prompt in that case. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3944
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:29:03 +0200 pullbundle: fix handling of gzip bundlespecs
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:29:03 +0200] rev 38678
pullbundle: fix handling of gzip bundlespecs Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3933
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:44:33 -0700 tests: add test demonstrating phase loss when cloning (issue5939)
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:44:33 -0700] rev 38677
tests: add test demonstrating phase loss when cloning (issue5939) The added tests demonstrate that phases exchange when using the listkeys based phases exchange fails to preserve public phase in a certain scenario when a merge is a phase root. Both non-bundle2 and bundle2 prior to the binary phase data part are buggy. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3932
Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:20:12 -0700 scmutil: rewrite docstring for filecache
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:20:12 -0700] rev 38676
scmutil: rewrite docstring for filecache The old docstring was incorrect in that it said that subsequent calls perform a stat() and refresh the object if things change. This is not how things work: __get__ populates obj.__dict__[self.sname] with the result of the decorated function and returns this value without validation on subsequent calls, if available. The correct usage of this type is kinda wonky. It would probably benefit from a refactor. But I don't have time to do that right now. But we can change the docstring so others aren't entrapped by its lies (like I was when using repofilecache in a Mozilla extension). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3943
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:35:54 +0530 rebase: correct misleading message in --confirm option
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:35:54 +0530] rev 38675
rebase: correct misleading message in --confirm option Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3939
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:23:51 +0530 rebase: make sure we don't loose the return code in --confirm option
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:23:51 +0530] rev 38674
rebase: make sure we don't loose the return code in --confirm option return _dorebase() to make sure it returns 'return code'. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3938
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:01 -0700 rebase: use revnums (not nodes) for set of extinct revisions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:01 -0700] rev 38673
rebase: use revnums (not nodes) for set of extinct revisions There is no need to convert extinct revisions to nodeids. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3942
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:01:47 -0700 rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:01:47 -0700] rev 38672
rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice In the case where the node has successors, but none of them is an ancestor of the destination, we would iterate over the successor nodes twice, check if they're in the repo and convert them to revnums. I doubt it's a measureable cost, but it gets simpler this way too. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3941
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip