Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:56:21 -0400 lazymanifest: prevent leak when updating an entry more than once
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Sat, 11 Apr 2015 11:56:21 -0400] rev 24710
lazymanifest: prevent leak when updating an entry more than once __setitem__ on the lazymanifest C type wasn't checking to see if a line had previously been malloced before replacing it, leading to leaks if files got updated multiple times in the course of a task. I was able to reproduce the leak with this change to test-manifest.py: diff --git a/tests/test-manifest.py b/tests/test-manifest.py --- a/tests/test-manifest.py +++ b/tests/test-manifest.py @@ -456,6 +456,16 @@ class basemanifesttests(object): ['a/b/c/bar.txt', 'a/b/c/foo.txt', 'a/b/d/ten.txt'], m2.keys()) + def testManifestSetItem(self): + m = self.parsemanifest('') + for x in range(3): + m['file%d' % x] = BIN_HASH_1 + for x in range(3): + m['file%d' % x] = BIN_HASH_2 + import time + time.sleep(4) + + along with the commands: $ make local $ PYTHONPATH=. SILENT_BE_NOISY=1 python tests/test-manifest.py testmanifestdict.testManifestSetItem & $ sleep 4 $ leaks $(jobs -p | tee /dev/stderr | awk '{print $3}') $ wait in an interactive shell on OS X. As far as I can tell, it had to be an interactive shell so that I could get the pid of the test run using the jobs builtin. Prior to this change, I was leaking several strings, and after this change leaks reports no leaks. I thought there was a bug filed for this in bugzilla, but I can't find it either in bugzilla or by searching my email.
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:42:25 -0500 strip: properly clear resolve state with --keep (issue4593)
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:42:25 -0500] rev 24709
strip: properly clear resolve state with --keep (issue4593) Normal updates automatically clean up the resolve state, but strip --keep does a "manual" update that bypasses the normal machinery. This adds a mergestate reset.
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:53:05 -0700 revsets: more informative syntax error message
Ryan McElroy <rmcelroy@fb.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:53:05 -0700] rev 24708
revsets: more informative syntax error message I came across a case where an internal command was using a revset that I didn't immediately pass in and it was difficult to debug what was going wrong with the revset. This prints out the revset and informs the user that the error is with a rebset so it should be more obvious what and where the error is.
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:06:21 -0700 revsets: show current revset abort behavior
Ryan McElroy <rmcelroy@fb.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:06:21 -0700] rev 24707
revsets: show current revset abort behavior
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:28:37 -0400 tests: move blackbox testing of tags to test-tags.t
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:28:37 -0400] rev 24706
tests: move blackbox testing of tags to test-tags.t We're going to refactor tags cache shortly. It is easier to test the blackbox logging if these tests are in test-tags.t.
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:36:33 -0400 tests: move mock blackbox extension into own file
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:36:33 -0400] rev 24705
tests: move mock blackbox extension into own file Having all blackbox log testing in test-blackbox.t isn't scalable. Move the mock blackbox extension into its own file so we can start to move blackbox logging into other tests.
Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:59:31 -0400 shelve: acquire lock in the right order
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:59:31 -0400] rev 24704
shelve: acquire lock in the right order Text book says that 'wlock' should be acquired before 'lock'. Caught through developer warning.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip