Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:38:20 -0700 clone: put streaming clones in a transaction
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:38:20 -0700] rev 20880
clone: put streaming clones in a transaction Streaming clones were writing to files outside of a transaction. Soon the fncache will be written at transaction close time, so we need streaming clones to be in a transaction.
Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:31:47 -0700 fncache: remove the rewriting logic
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:31:47 -0700] rev 20879
fncache: remove the rewriting logic The fncache could rewrite itself during a read operation if it noticed any entries that were no longer on disk. This was problematic because it caused Mercurial to perform write operations outside the scope of a lock or transaction, which could interefere with any other pending writes. This will be replaced in a future patch by logic that cleans up the fncache as files are deleted during strips.
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:55:32 -0700 pull: prevent duplicated entry in `op.pulledsubset`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:55:32 -0700] rev 20878
pull: prevent duplicated entry in `op.pulledsubset` In the bare pull case we could add the same node multiple time to the `pulloperation.pulledsubset`. Beside being a bit wrong this confused the new revset implementation of `revset._revancestor` into giving bad result. This changeset fix the pull operation part. The fix for the revset itself will come in another changeset.
Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:24:45 -0700 bundle2: part params
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:24:45 -0700] rev 20877
bundle2: part params
Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:36:15 -0700 bundle2: support for bundling and unbundling payload
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 19 Mar 2014 23:36:15 -0700] rev 20876
bundle2: support for bundling and unbundling payload We add the ability to bundle and unbundle a payload in parts. The payload is the actual binary data of the part. It is used to convey all the applicative data. For now we stick to very simple implementation with all the data fit in single chunk. This open the door to some bundle2 testing usage. This will be improved before bundle2 get used for real. We need to be able to stream the payload in multiple part to exchange any changegroup efficiently. This simple version will do for now. Bundling and unbundling are done in the same changeset because the test for parts is less modular. However, the result is not too complex.
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:59:06 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:59:06 -0500] rev 20875
merge with stable
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:57:04 -0500 Added signature for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:57:04 -0500] rev 20874
Added signature for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:56:55 -0500 Added tag 2.9.2 for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:56:55 -0500] rev 20873
Added tag 2.9.2 for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:52:16 +0900 backout: correct commit status of no changes made (BC) (issue4190) stable 2.9.2
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:52:16 +0900] rev 20872
backout: correct commit status of no changes made (BC) (issue4190) If backout generated no changes to commit, it showed wrong status, "changeset <target> backs out changeset <target>", and raised TypeError with -v option. This changes the return code to 1, which is the same as "hg commit" and "hg rebase".
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:41:56 +0900 backout: document return code of merge conflict stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:41:56 +0900] rev 20871
backout: document return code of merge conflict
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:11:19 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:11:19 -0500] rev 20870
merge with stable
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20869
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that format string consists of multiple string components concatenated implicitly or explicitly, This patch does below for that regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. - put "+" into separator part ("[ \t\n]") for explicit concatenation ("...." + "...." style) - enclose "component and separator" part by "(?:....)+" for concatenation itself ("...." "...." or "...." + "....")
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20868
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that the format string and "%" aren't placed in the same line. This patch replaces "\s" in that regexp pattern with "[ \t\n]" to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. "[\s\n]" can't be used in this purpose, because "\s" is automatically replaced with "[ \t]" by "_preparepats()" and "\s" in "[]" causes nested "[]" unexpectedly.
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20867
merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -14 +14 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip