Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:46:43 +0200 subrepo: more isolation, only use ui for hg.peer when there is no repo stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:46:43 +0200] rev 17875
subrepo: more isolation, only use ui for hg.peer when there is no repo ui contains repo specific configuration, so do not use it when there is a repo. But pass it to hg.peer when there is no repo. Then it only contains global configuration.
Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:28:36 +0200 peer: subrepo isolation, pass repo instead of repo.ui to hg.peer stable
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:28:36 +0200] rev 17874
peer: subrepo isolation, pass repo instead of repo.ui to hg.peer Do not pass ui because it contains the configuration of the repo. It is the same object as repo.ui. When a repo is passed to hg.peer, the global configuration is read from repo.baseui.
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:11:24 +0900 subrepo: isolate configuration between each repositories in subrepo tree stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:11:24 +0900] rev 17873
subrepo: isolate configuration between each repositories in subrepo tree Before this patch, repository local configurations are not isolated between repositories in subrepo tree, because "localrepository" objects for each subrepositories are created with "ui" instance of the parent of each ones. So, local configuration of the parent or higher repositories are visible also in children or lower ones. This patch uses "baseui" instead of "ui" to create repository object: the former contains only global configuration. This patch also copies 'ui.commitsubrepos' configuration to commit recursively in subrepo tree, because it may be set in not "repo.baseui" but "repo.ui".
Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:39:47 -0500 bookmarks: backed out new message from changeset 52c7e171e355 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:39:47 -0500] rev 17872
bookmarks: backed out new message from changeset 52c7e171e355 Not strictly a bugfix, hasn't achieved consensus yet.
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:53:31 +0200 clone: print bookmark name when clone activates a bookmark stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:53:31 +0200] rev 17871
clone: print bookmark name when clone activates a bookmark Similar to the message that prints the checked out branch name. Without this, the user might accidentally move the @ bookmark.
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:37:03 +0200 clone: activate @ bookmark if updating to it stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:37:03 +0200] rev 17870
clone: activate @ bookmark if updating to it The message "updating bookmark @ failed!" in test-bookmarks-pushpull.t is correct, because the changeset that the @ bookmark points to is not pushed to the target repository.
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:20:44 +0200 test-clone.t: check that branch "@" is not automatically checked out stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:20:44 +0200] rev 17869
test-clone.t: check that branch "@" is not automatically checked out This verifies that c9339efed653 fixes the second problem mentioned in issue3677.
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:09:55 +0200 test-bookmarks.t: check that bookmark "default" is not automatically checked out stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:09:55 +0200] rev 17868
test-bookmarks.t: check that bookmark "default" is not automatically checked out This verifies that c9339efed653 fixes the problem originally reported in issue3677.
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:36:15 +0200 clone: make sure to use "@" as bookmark and "default" as branch (issue3677) stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:36:15 +0200] rev 17867
clone: make sure to use "@" as bookmark and "default" as branch (issue3677) Before this change a bookmark named "default" or a branch named "@" would cause the wrong changeset to be checked out. The change in output of test-hardlinks.t is due to the fact that no unneeded tag lookups for the tags "@" or "default" happen, therefore the cache file is not created.
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:29:50 +0200 bookmark: simplify nodemap check introduced in the previous changeset stable
Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:29:50 +0200] rev 17866
bookmark: simplify nodemap check introduced in the previous changeset
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:43:52 +0200 bookmark: prevent crashing when a successor is unknown locally (issue3680) stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:43:52 +0200] rev 17865
bookmark: prevent crashing when a successor is unknown locally (issue3680) The `%ln` revset substitution does not accept unknown node. We prune unknown node from potential successors before computing descendants. This have no impact on the result of this function. - Descendants of unknown changeset as unknown, - all successors of unknown changesets are already return by the call who returned those same unknown changesets, - unknown changesets are never a valid destination for a bookmark.
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:36:03 +0200 bookmark: complexity pull-push test to have deeper tree stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:36:03 +0200] rev 17864
bookmark: complexity pull-push test to have deeper tree This changeset only touch test. The previous test was correct, it tested that the successors of an old bookmark position was seen as a valid destination for bookmark. However, a newer version is made for two reason: (1) The new test check further. It check that the descendant of the successors is a valid destination (2) An ever more complexe test is needed to validate a future fix to issue 3680 Splitting complexification of the test and actual bugfix help to reduce the noise in the bugfix changeset. Issue 3680 is NOT fixed by this changeset.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip