largefiles: modernize how capabilities are added to the wire protocol See 982f13bef503, which came well after this code was originally written.

lfs: show a friendly message when pushing lfs to a server without lfs enabled Upfront disclaimer: I don't know anything about the wire protocol, and this was pretty much cargo-culted from largefiles, and then clonebundles, since it seems more modern. I was surprised that exchange.push() will ensure all of the proper requirements when exchanging between two local repos, but doesn't care when one is remote. All this new capability marker does is inform the client that the extension is enabled remotely. It may or may not contain commits with external blobs. Open issues: - largefiles uses 'largefiles=serve' for its capability. Someday I hope to be able to push lfs blobs to an `hg serve` instance. That will probably require a distinct capability. Should it change to '=serve' then? Or just add an 'lfs-serve' capability then? - The flip side of this is more complicated. It looks like largefiles adds an 'lheads' command for the client to signal to the server that the extension is loaded. That is then converted to 'heads' and sent through the normal wire protocol plumbing. A client using the 'heads' command directly is kicked out with a message indicating that the largefiles extension must be loaded. We could do similar with 'lfsheads', but then a repo with both largefiles and lfs blobs can't be pushed over the wire. Hopefully somebody with more wire protocol experience can think of something else. I see 'x-hgarg-1' on some commands in the tests, but not on heads, and didn't dig any further.

lfs: allow non-lfs exchanges when the extension is only enabled on one side Once the 'lfs' requirement is added, the extension must be loaded on both sides, and changegroup3 used. But there's no reason that I can see for bailing with cryptic errors if lfs is not required, but randomly enabled somewhere.

lfs: add the 'lfs' requirement in the changegroup transaction introducing lfs A hook like this is how largefiles manages to do the same. Largefiles uses a changegroup hook, but this uses pretxnchangegroup because that actually causes the transaction to rollback in the unlikely event that writing the requirements out fails. Sadly, the requires file itself isn't rolled back if a subsequent hook fails, but that seems trivial. Now that commit, changegroup and convert are covered, I don't think there's any way to get an lfs repo without the requirement. The grep exit code is blotted out of some test-lfs-serve.t tests now showing the requirement, because run-tests.py doesn't support conditionalizing the exit code.