Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:41:18 -0600] rev 20280
merge: consider successor changesets for a bare update
Previously, a bare update would ignore any successor changesets thus
potentially leaving you on an obsolete head. This happens commonly when there
is an old bookmark that hasn't been moved forward which is the motivating
reason for this patch series.
Now, we will check for successor changesets if two conditions hold: 1) we are
doing a bare update 2) *and* we are currently on an obsolete head.
If we are in this situation, then we calculate the branchtip of the successor
set and update to that changeset.
Tests coverage has been added.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:02:07 -0600] rev 20279
merge: refactor initialization of variables in update
There is no code change here but this helps prepare for future commits that
will fix a bare update with obsolete markers.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:26:25 -0600] rev 20278
merge: update comment for future devs
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:14:12 -0600] rev 20277
obsolete: clarify documentation for succcessorssets