Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 03:48:00 +0100] rev 41170
discovery: move missing tracking inside the partialdiscovery object
This is the final set that we need to track to have a fully up to date
information within the object.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 03:39:43 +0100] rev 41169
discovery: add a `iscomplete` method to the `partialdiscovery` object
The method is used by higher level logic to know if the initial discovery
question has been answered.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 03:34:23 +0100] rev 41168
discovery: update undecided from common directly within partialdiscovery
The object knows when there are changes in the "common" set, so it is a good
place to update the undecided set.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 28 Dec 2018 03:23:37 +0100] rev 41167
discovery: move undecided set on the partialdiscovery
To initialize it, we need to know the discovery target. This commit only move
the set on the `partialdiscovery` object, later changeset will take advantage of
it.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 09 Jan 2019 15:34:24 -0800] rev 41166
histedit: use context manager for locks
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5542
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 09 Jan 2019 15:32:26 -0800] rev 41165
histedit: drop unused constructor arguments (API)
All in-tree callers pass a repo and nothing else.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5541
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 05 Jan 2019 19:50:30 -0500] rev 41164
phabricator: teach {phabreview} to work without --amend
There's some possibility of this being wrong (e.g. if the url config was
changed). But commit messages can be amended too, so that isn't bulletproof
either. Having something seems better than just returning None.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 05 Jan 2019 15:20:33 -0500] rev 41163
phabricator: warn if unable to amend, instead of aborting after posting
There was a divergence in behavior here between obsolete and strip based
amending. I first noticed the abort when testing outside of the test harness,
but then had trouble recreating it here after reverting the code changes. It
turns out, strip based amend was successfully amending the public commit after
it was posted! It looks like the protection is in the `commit --amend` command,
not in the underlying code that it calls.
I considered doing a preflight check and aborting. But the locks are only
acquired at the end, if amending, and this is too large a section of code to be
wrapped in a maybe-it's-held-or-not context manager for my tastes.
Additionally, some people do post-push reviews, and amending is the default
behavior, so they shouldn't see a misleading error message.
The lack of a 'Differential Revision' entry in the commit message breaks a
{phabreview} test, so it had to be partially conditionalized.