Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:58:24 +0200] rev 50747
rust-changelog: removed now useless early conditional for NULL_REVISION
Now that the underlying `RevlogEntry` returned for `NULL_REVISION` is
viable, it has become pointless to check NULL_REVISION several times,
even for performance: the check will be far more frequent than the benefit
of bailing earlier in the rare case where the requested revision is
`NULL_REVISION`.
This case is covered explicitly by the first assertion of
`test_data_from_rev_null`.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:53:40 +0200] rev 50746
rust-revlog: fix RevlogEntry.data() for NULL_REVISION
Before this change, the pseudo-entry returned by `Revlog.get_entry` for
`NULL_REVISION` would trigger errors in application code using it.
For example, this fixes a crash spotted with changelog data
while implementing RHGitaly: `Changelog.data_for_rev(-1)` was already
returning the pseudo content as expected, e.g., for `hg log`, but
`Changelog.entry_for_rev(-1).data()` would still crash with
"corrupted revlog, hash check failed for revision -1". There is
an added test for this scenario.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 06 Jul 2023 11:43:26 +0200] rev 50745
rust-revlog: using constant in test
Always better
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:34:30 +0200] rev 50744
rust-revlog: fix incorrect results with NULL_NODE prefixes
In case a short hash is a prefix of `NULL_NODE`, the correct revision
number lookup is `NULL_REVISION` only if there is no match in the nodemap.
Indeed, if there is a single nodemap match, then it is an ambiguity with the
always matching `NULL_NODE`.
Before this change, using the Mercurial development repository as a testbed (it
has public changesets with node ID starting with `0005` and `0009`), this is
what `rhg` did (plain `hg` provided for reference)
```
$ rust/target/debug/rhg cat -r 000 README
README: no such file in rev
000000000000
$ hg cat -r 000 README
abort: ambiguous revision identifier: 000
```
Here is the expected output for `rhg` on ambiguous prefixes (again, before
this change):
```
$ rust/target/debug/rhg cat -r 0001 README
abort: ambiguous revision identifier: 0001
```
The test provided by
8c29af0f6d6e in `test-rhg.t` could become flaky with
this change, unless all hashes are fixed. We expect reviewers to be more
sure about that than we are.
Georges Racinet <georges.racinet@octobus.net> [Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:29:29 +0200] rev 50743
rust-revlog: split out method for `rev_from_node` without persistent nodemap
This will make easier for the bug fix that is about to come.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:03:54 -0400] rev 50742
win32mbcs: unbyteify some strings for py3 support
A crash was reported on the TortoiseHg bug tracker for this[1].
[1] https://foss.heptapod.net/mercurial/tortoisehg/thg/-/issues/5905
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Tue, 04 Jul 2023 12:30:31 +0200] rev 50741
heptapod-ci: turn off pipelines for merge request events
These are always duplicated by the external (from the user) push, or internal
(from Heptapod itself) push pipeline, so they're entirely redundant.
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Tue, 04 Jul 2023 12:23:05 +0200] rev 50740
heptapod-ci: always make the default run condition explicit
This has no effect on behavior, it's just to make everything obvious.
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Tue, 04 Jul 2023 12:21:45 +0200] rev 50739
heptapod-ci: remove push exception for named branches
The internal workings of Heptapod cause even fast-forward merges to look like
pushes to Gitlab. The only way to run a pipeline on topic-less named branches
is not through the web interface. I am probably the only person affected by
this, so it's not really a problem.
This was confirmed with Georges, the maintainer of Heptapod, though the only
way to be *actually* sure, is to merge this and see.
Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net> [Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:28:17 +0200] rev 50738
heptapod-ci: (hopefully) fix the pipeline savings system
There is no easy way for me to test this outside of the actual repo since
it would require setting up `heptapod-runner` locally, making a Git repo
with the right changes, etc. It's not worth my time at this point.
If this fails, I'll try to ask for help from Georges, the maintainer
of Heptapod.