Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:11:19 +0530 scmutil: introduce filterrequirements() to split reqs into wc and store ones
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 07 Aug 2020 16:11:19 +0530] rev 45482
scmutil: introduce filterrequirements() to split reqs into wc and store ones In upcoming patches where we try to implement requirements in store, we will need a mechanism to split all requirements on some basis and decide which one goes to `.hg/requires` and which one goes to `.hg/store/requires`. This patch introduce a separate function for that. Filtering logic for now is put under an `if False:`. In upcoming patches it will be removed. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8913
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:28:53 -0700 remotefilelog: acquire lock before writing requirements on clone
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:28:53 -0700] rev 45481
remotefilelog: acquire lock before writing requirements on clone Performing a shallow clone in remotefilelog does not acquire lock. This leads to following warning when we try to write some requirements in store: ``` --- /home/gps/src/hg-committed/tests/test-remotefilelog-share.t +++ /home/gps/src/hg-committed/tests/test-remotefilelog-share.t#safe.err @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ $ hgcloneshallow ssh://user@dummy/master source --noupdate -q + devel-warn: write with no lock: "requires" at: /home/gps/src/hg-committed/mercurial/scmutil.py:1505 (writerequires) $ hg share source dest updating working directory 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved ``` Let's lock before writing the requirements file. Another solution which I can think of is not warn about missing lock when writing to requires file in store. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8952
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:23:12 +0900 grep: make -frREV follow history from the specified revision (BC)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:23:12 +0900] rev 45480
grep: make -frREV follow history from the specified revision (BC) This is close to what "log -frREV" will do, and is backported from 8b4b9ee6001a, "log: make -fr show complete history from the given revs" except for the "del opts['follow']" bit. I'm planning to rewrite cmdutil.walkchangerevs() to share the core logic with logcmdutil, and this is the first step towards that. There are still many broken tests, but the fundamental behavior should be fixed by this patch. .. bc:: `hg grep -fr REV` now follows history from the specified `REV`, works in the same way as `hg log -fr REV`. The previous behavior was to limit the search space to `REV` while following the history.
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:33:41 +0900 cmdutil: make walkchangerevs() gracefully handle wdir parents
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:33:41 +0900] rev 45479
cmdutil: make walkchangerevs() gracefully handle wdir parents This code will be completely rewritten, but test-grep.t would fail without fixing it.
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:30:34 +0900 grep: fix --follow with no --diff nor --rev to not fall back to plain grep
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:30:34 +0900] rev 45478
grep: fix --follow with no --diff nor --rev to not fall back to plain grep Before, "grep --follow" would only print matches in the working directory. Since --follow is the option to specify the search space, it should disable the plain (i.e. wdir) grep.
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:39:45 +0900 test-grep: add tests for --follow with/without --diff and/or paths
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:39:45 +0900] rev 45477
test-grep: add tests for --follow with/without --diff and/or paths This tests the behavior of cmdutil.walkchangerevs(). I'm going to rewrite cmdutil.walkchangerevs() to leverage the "log -f" logic, but the code coverage looked quite small. And the history traversal of "grep -f" goes wrong in various ways.
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:10:53 +0900 grep: clarify that --all works exactly the same way as --diff
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:10:53 +0900] rev 45476
grep: clarify that --all works exactly the same way as --diff 7fbb5d76c555 "grep: add --diff flag" says as such, but the help strings have diverged since, and it's getting fuzzier what this --all will do.
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:34:13 +0200 churn: add an usage example in docstring
"Stephane" <stephane@yaal.fr> [Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:34:13 +0200] rev 45475
churn: add an usage example in docstring
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:47:19 +0530 tests: run test-check-py3-compat only in pure python mode
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:47:19 +0530] rev 45474
tests: run test-check-py3-compat only in pure python mode This test was added few years ago to detect syntax and import related warnings and kickstart the python-3 porting efforts. It tries to parse the ast and import the module. When using in strict modes like `HGMODULEPOLICY=rust` or `HGMODULEPOLICY=c`, the test fails. Let's run the test only on pure python mode. We now have full test suite being run with python 3 and some people even use hg with python 3 in production (like me).
Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:23:47 +0900 log: make -frREV PATH detect missing files before falling back to slow path
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:23:47 +0900] rev 45473
log: make -frREV PATH detect missing files before falling back to slow path If -rREV isn't specified, "log --follow" would abort on nonexistent paths. Let's implement this behavior for "-frREV" case as we have ctx.hasdir() now. Otherwise "log -frREV PATH" would silently fall back to slow path and files wouldn't be followed across renames. The loop is quadratic (as before), but the size of the startctxs and match.files() should be small in general. Some tests are marked as BROKEN since file renames aren't tracked in the slow path. This is a known limitation of the current history traversal function.
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:13:35 +0900 log: fix -fr'wdir()' PATH to follow newly added file
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:13:35 +0900] rev 45472
log: fix -fr'wdir()' PATH to follow newly added file Testing filelog doesn't make sense in this case because the file existence is tested against the specified changectxs. If the filelog is empty and if startctxs != [wctx], 'f not in c' should be triggered.
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:08:58 +0900 log: reorganize if-else and for loop in logcmdutil._makematcher()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:08:58 +0900] rev 45471
log: reorganize if-else and for loop in logcmdutil._makematcher() The test conditions are branchy depending on --follow and --rev options, so it should be better to switch first by --follow --rev. Note that revs is not empty so "if follow and startctxs" can be replaced with "if follow and opts.get(b'rev')".
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:37:23 +0530 merge: update commitinfo from all mergeresults during bid merge
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:37:23 +0530] rev 45470
merge: update commitinfo from all mergeresults during bid merge During bid merge, it's not clear which commitinfo should be stored and which one should not. This depends on which side the bid merge chooses for a file. For this we will need to refactor bid merge code and commitinfo handling. For now, we just blindly updates info since we hardly have any users of commitinfo and this will help us in testing and clearing out further path. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8965
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:22:28 +0530 merge: add missing ACTION_KEEP when both remote and ancestor are not present
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:22:28 +0530] rev 45469
merge: add missing ACTION_KEEP when both remote and ancestor are not present Previous patch may lead to confusion that the related criss-cross merge is consistent when done from any of the parents. However this is not true and we were missing setting an ACTION_KEEP. This patch now exposes that bid-merge favors ACTION_KEEP always and the result of merge is different when started from different parents. This change also effects a test case above where bid merge was wrongly picking `r` because it was missing keep related information from one of the ancestor. After this test, we are back in a state in the criss-cross merge tests where the result depends on which parent we are merging from. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8941
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:20:09 +0530 merge: store ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT when we are keeping the file absent locally
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:20:09 +0530] rev 45468
merge: store ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT when we are keeping the file absent locally If a file is not present on the local side, and it's unchanged between other merge parent and ancestor, we don't use any action, neither we had a if-else branch for that condition. This leads to bid-merge missing that there is a such action possible which can be performed. As test changes demonstrate, we now choose the locally deleted side instead of choosing the remote one consistently. This is also wrong behavior which is resulted because of missing possible action. It will be fixed in next patch. This whole logic is not acurrate as we should prompt user on what to do when this kind of criss-cross merge is in play. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8940
Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:08:26 +0530 merge: add `ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT` to represent files we want to keep absent
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:08:26 +0530] rev 45467
merge: add `ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT` to represent files we want to keep absent There are files which were deleted/not present in working copy parent but were present on other side of merge. On merge, we might decide to keep them deleted. We want to track such cases more closely, rather all kind of cases which results from some kind of merging logic. We do have `ACTION_KEEP` but having a dedicated action for the absent case is more cleaner. Initially I named the action as `ACTION_KEEP_DELETED` but later realized that file can be not-present because of other reasons than deletion like rename, hence decided to use more generic name `ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT`. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8974
Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:51:39 +0530 mergeresult: introduce dedicated tuple for no-op actions
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:51:39 +0530] rev 45466
mergeresult: introduce dedicated tuple for no-op actions This will help us in adding more no-op actions in next patch while keeping the code cleaner.
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:27:46 +0200 tests: add criss cross merging tests whose behavior need to be fixed
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:27:46 +0200] rev 45465
tests: add criss cross merging tests whose behavior need to be fixed Merging two changesets can mark a file as removed post merge. However, in some cases, a user might not want to remove that file and they revert the removal back and commit the merge. All this works perfectly well. However, when we do criss-cross merges with such merge where user explicitly choose to revert the removal with one where another user choose the removal, we does not get any conflict. The intent here is conflicting and merge should result in conflicts. One user merged and want to keep the file while other user merged and want to remove the file. Merging those merges should result in conflicts. This patch adds test cases for these cases. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8939
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:52:06 -0700 repo: avoid copying/updating a dict on every `repo.__getitem__`
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:52:06 -0700] rev 45464
repo: avoid copying/updating a dict on every `repo.__getitem__` This has some mild performance benefits. I'm looking into a pathological case where one of our `hg log` invocations takes several seconds, and according to hyperfine this reduces the wall time of the entire operation (running in chg) from: ``` Time (mean ± σ): 7.390 s ± 0.106 s [User: 7.058 s, System: 0.271 s] Range (min … max): 7.300 s … 7.625 s ``` to: ``` Time (mean ± σ): 7.046 s ± 0.091 s [User: 6.714 s, System: 0.279 s] Range (min … max): 6.916 s … 7.169 s ``` Note: the log command is slow due to an issue in our custom stuff executing `repo[<arg>]` 298,800 times. This performance improvement is likely not noticeable during normal operation, but I don't feel like it's making the code more difficult to understand, and every small bit helps. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9022
Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:23:44 +0200 obsstore: refactor v1 logic to fix 32 byte hash support
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:23:44 +0200] rev 45463
obsstore: refactor v1 logic to fix 32 byte hash support Refactor the v1 logic to determine the node parsing based on the flag. Move the predecessor out of the fixed part and handle it like the other nodes, removing most of the duplicated code for parsing 20/32 bytes hashes. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8801
Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:32:24 -0400 fsmonitor: increase the threshold before we recommend it, when using rust
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:32:24 -0400] rev 45462
fsmonitor: increase the threshold before we recommend it, when using rust 50k files works just fine with the rust status, and it's annoying to get told "consider using fsmonitor" when we have another solution to the status speed. 400k files was not chosen in any rigorous way. I know 200k files is fine. Twice as many files should still be fine. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9021
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:15:06 +0200 copy-tracing: test case where a merge reverted a file deletion
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:15:06 +0200] rev 45461
copy-tracing: test case where a merge reverted a file deletion This case is currently broken for commit centric copy tracing. So we add an official case for it with a note about it being broken. Fixing it will requires multiples change in code related to merge, commit and copy tracing, so we introduce it beforehand for simplicity. Also, I have been sitting on this test for 3 months so I would rather have it upstream.
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:04:48 +0200 copy-tracing: test case where we go across a changed/deleted merge
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:04:48 +0200] rev 45460
copy-tracing: test case where we go across a changed/deleted merge This case is currently broken in the commit centric case. So we add an official case for it with a note about it being broken. Fixing it will requires multiples change in code related to merge, commit and copy tracing, so we introduce it beforehand for simplicity. Also, I have been sitting on this test for 3 months so I would rather have it upstream.
Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:20:53 +0530 merge: show list of bids for each file in bid-merge in ui.debug()
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:20:53 +0530] rev 45459
merge: show list of bids for each file in bid-merge in ui.debug() Earlier, we were showing the list of bids only when we were ambiguously picking. However, the cases where we unambiguously picked a side may not always be correct and need to be fixed. Having list of bids for all files will be helpful in debugging. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8966
Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:39:51 +0900 merge with stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:39:51 +0900] rev 45458
merge with stable
Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:52:24 +0900 cmdutil: reimplement finddate() without using walkchangerevs()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:52:24 +0900] rev 45457
cmdutil: reimplement finddate() without using walkchangerevs() It's simpler and slightly faster maybe because a fewer Python ops would run. Unscientific benchmark: $ python -m timeit \ -s 'from mercurial import hg, ui, cmdutil; repo = hg.repository(ui.ui())' \ 'cmdutil.finddate(repo.ui, repo, "<2008-01-01")' (orig) 10 loops, best of 3: 1.45 sec per loop (new) 10 loops, best of 3: 1.25 sec per loop Now "hg churn" and "hg grep" are the only users of walkchangerevs(), which I want to refactor and fix bugs.
Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:14:51 +0900 test-simple-update: add test for -d DATE option
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:14:51 +0900] rev 45456
test-simple-update: add test for -d DATE option I couldn't find any tests for cmdutil.finddate() except for the abort case.
Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:46:48 +0900 largefiles: walk history in ascending order while downloading all lfiles
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:46:48 +0900] rev 45455
largefiles: walk history in ascending order while downloading all lfiles I don't think the order matters. Maybe it's purely because of the use of walkchangerevs(), which was originally designed for "hg log" command. Surprisingly, the number of objects fetched in test-largefiles.t has changed. According to the --verbose output, the order of the following fetches flipped and the latter got deduplicated. getting large3:eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4 found eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4 in store getting sub/large4:eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4 found eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4 in store
Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:43:19 +0900 largefiles: replace use of walkchangerevs() with simple revset query
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:43:19 +0900] rev 45454
largefiles: replace use of walkchangerevs() with simple revset query Since it does nothing in prepare(), what we're doing is just walking revisions matching ".hglf" in reverse order.
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:47:17 +0900 largefiles: remove unused 'rev' parameter from downloadlfiles()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:47:17 +0900] rev 45453
largefiles: remove unused 'rev' parameter from downloadlfiles() It's no longer used since 83ead8cb0ff2 "largefiles: implement pull --all-largefiles as a special case of --lfrev."
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip